3:17-cr-00134•USA v. Addison et al
Full text
Case 3:17-cr-00134-FDW-MTO Document 1609 Filed 05/29/18 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:17-cr-00134-FDW-MTO Document 1609 Filed 05/29/18 Page 2 of 2
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CRIMINAL NO.: 3:17cr134-FDW UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) CONSENT ORDER AND v. ) JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE ) PENDING RULE 32.2(c)(2) (59) JAMES BRANDIN PEGUES ) BASED UPON the Defendant’s plea of guilty and finding that there is a nexus between the property listed below and the offense(s) to which the Defendant has pled guilty and that the Defendant (or any combination of Defendants in this case) has or had a possessory interest or other legal interest in the property, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The following property is forfeited to the United States pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1963(a) and 924(d), provided, however, that forfeiture of specific assets is subject to any and all third party petitions under 21 U.S.C. § 853(n), pending final adjudication herein: e One (1) Lorcin Engineering, Model L380, .380 caliber pistol, serial number 052316, and ammunition; and e One (1) Shooters Arms MFG (Imported by American Tactical), .45 caliber pistol, serial number G1103285, and ammunition; and e 357 caliber ammunition, all such items seized during the investigation of Defendant. 2. The United States Marshals Service, the investigative agency, and/or the agency contractor is authorized to take possession and maintain custody of the above specific asset(s). 3. If and to the extent required by Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(6), 21 U.S.C. § 853(n), and/or other applicable law, the United States shall publish notice and provide direct written notice of forfeiture. 4, Any person, other than the Defendant, asserting any legal interest in the property may, within thirty days of the publication of notice or the receipt of notice, whichever is earlier, petition the court for a hearing to adjudicate the validity of the alleged interest. 5. Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(3), upon entry of this order, the United States Attorney’s Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate, or dispose of the property, including depositions, interrogatories, and request for production of documents, and to issue subpoenas pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 45. INFORMATION GPO ee 3:17-cr-00134-FDW-MTO Document1609_ Filed 05/29/18 Page 1 of 2 6. As to any specific assets, following the Court’s disposition of all timely petitions, a final order of forfeiture shall be entered. If no third party files a timely petition, this order shall become the final order of forfeiture, as provided by Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(c)(2), and the United States shall have clear title to the property, and shall dispose of the property according to law. The parties stipulate and agree that the aforementioned asset(s) constitute property acquired or maintained in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962, property affording a source of influence over a racketeering enterprise in violation of Section 1962, proceeds of racketeering in violation of Section 1962, and/or one or more firearms involved in a criminal violation, and are therefore subject to forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 1963(a) and/or 924(d). The Defendant hereby waives the requirements of Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2 and 43(a) regarding notice of the forfeiture in the charging instrument, announcement of the forfeiture at sentencing, and incorporation of the forfeiture in the judgment against Defendant. If the Defendant has previously submitted a claim in response to an administrative forfeiture proceeding regarding any of this property, Defendant hereby withdraws that claim. If Defendant has not previously submitted such a claim, Defendant hereby waives all right to do so. As to any firearms listed above and/or in the charging instrument, Defendant consents to destruction by federal, state, or local law enforcement authorities upon such legal process as they, in their sole discretion deem to legally sufficient, and waives any and all right to further notice of such process or such destruction. R. ANDREW MURRAY UNITED STATES,ATTORNEY (Lx. Yam hire» eq ved bar ANDREW CRHJGHTON JAMES BRANDIN PEGUES Trial Attorney Defendant MATTHEW T. WARREN Assistant United States Attorney SCOTT GSELL Attorney for Defendant Signed this the 24 tha, of May, 2018. HON. PRANK D. WHITNEY a CHIEF UNITED STATES JUDGE Case 3:17-cr-00134-FDW-MTO Document 1609 Filed 05/29/18 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.