1:22-cv-00114•City of Brevard, North Carolina v. HCA Healthcare, Inc. et al
City of Brevard, North Carolina v. HCA Healthcare, Inc. et al
1:22-cv-00114NcwdAug 8, 2022
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CITY OF BREVARD, NORTH ) CAROLINA, on its own behalf and ) on behalf of all others similarly ) situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CIVIL CASE NO. vs. ) 1:22-cv-00114-MR-WCM ) HCA HEALTHCARE, INC., HCA ) MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LP, ) HCA, INC., MH MASTER HOLDINGS, ) LLLP, MH HOSPITAL MANAGER, ) LLC, MH MISSION HOSPITAL, LLLP, ) ANC HEALTHCARE, INC. f/k/a ) MISSION HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., ) and MISSION HOSPITAL, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) ________________________________ ) ) BUNCOMBE COUNTY, NORTH ) CAROLINA and CITY OF ) ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, ) on their own behalf and on behalf ) of all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) CIVIL CASE NO. vs. ) 1:22-cv-00147-MR-WCM ) HCA HEALTHCARE, INC., HCA ) MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LP, ) HCA, INC., MH MASTER HOLDINGS, ) LLLP, MH HOSPITAL MANAGER, ) LLC, MH MISSION HOSPITAL, LLLP, ) Case 1:22-cv-00114-MR Document 42 Filed 08/08/22 Page 1 of 4
2 ANC HEALTHCARE, INC. f/k/a ) MISSION HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., ) and MISSION HOSPITAL, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) ________________________________ ) ORDER AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN THIS MATTER is before the Court on the “Joint Motion of Plaintiffs and Defendants to Consolidate and for Entry of Initial Case Management Order.” [Civil Case No. 1:22-cv-00114-MR-WCM, Doc. 41]. Rule 42 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that the Court may consolidate two civil actions if they involve “a common question of law or fact.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a)(2). The Court finds that these two civil actions involve common questions of law and fact such that consolidation is appropriate. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the “Joint Motion of Plaintiffs and Defendants to Consolidate and for Entry of Initial Case Management Order” [Civil Case No. 1:22-cv-00114-MR-WCM, Doc. 41] is GRANTED, and Civil Case No. 1:22-cv-00114-MR-WCM and Civil Case No. 1:22-cv-00147-MR- WCM are hereby CONSOLIDATED for all purposes up to and including trial before the undersigned. Civil Case No. 1:22-cv-00114-MR-WCM is designated as the lead case, and Civil Case No. 1:22-cv-00147 shall be Case 1:22-cv-00114-MR Document 42 Filed 08/08/22 Page 2 of 4
3 closed. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 42.1, all future pleadings will be docketed and filed in the designated lead case only. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any counsel who has been admitted pro hac vice in Civil Case No. 1:22-cv-00114-MR-WCM and Civil Case No. 1:22-cv-00147-MR-WCM shall be admitted pro hac vice in the designated lead case, Civil Case No. 1:22-cv-00114-MR-WCM, and any counsel not so admitted may file an application to be admitted pro hac vice in the designated lead case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall follow the following initial case management plan to govern the filing of Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Class Action Complaint and Defendants’ anticipated response: (1) All papers filed in this action shall be filed under Civil Case No. 1:22-cv-00114-MR-WCM, the designated lead case, and must bear the following case name: In re Mission Health Antitrust Litigation; (2) Plaintiffs shall file a Consolidated Class Action Complaint (the “Consolidated Complaint”) by August 19, 2022; (3) Plaintiffs’ filing of the Consolidated Complaint shall not prejudice their ability to amend as of course under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1); Case 1:22-cv-00114-MR Document 42 Filed 08/08/22 Page 3 of 4
4 (4) Defendants shall respond to the Consolidated Complaint, including by filing any motion(s) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12, by September 9, 2022; (5) Plaintiffs’ opposition(s) to any such motion(s) filed pursuant to Rule 12 shall be filed by October 14, 2022; (6) Any reply in support of Defendants’ motion(s) shall be filed by November 4, 2022; (7) Defendants’ brief(s) in support of motion(s) filed pursuant to Rule 12 and Plaintiffs’ brief(s) in opposition to Defendants’ motion(s) shall each not exceed 25 pages. Defendants’ reply brief(s) shall each not exceed 10 pages. Briefs must be double spaced and in at least 14 point type. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: August 6, 2022 Case 1:22-cv-00114-MR Document 42 Filed 08/08/22 Page 4 of 4
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.