Veronica C. Green

1 The purpose of the Official Form is to determine whether a presumption of abuse arises
pursuant § 707(b)(2). The Official Form shows the debtor’s calculations as required by §
707(b)(2)(A), commonly referred to as the “means test.” Pursuant to § 707(b)(2), if a debtor’s
means test shows an ability to repay some portion of his debts, then there is a presumption of
abuse, and, absent special circumstances, the case must either be converted to chapter 13 or
dismissed. 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(2).
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
RALEIGH DIVISION
IN RE:
VERONICA C. GREEN,
DEBTOR.
CASE NO. 11-04026-8-JRL
CHAPTER 7
ORDER
This matter came before the court on the Bankruptcy Administrator’s (“BA”) motion to
dismiss the debtor’s case for abuse. A hearing was held on April 10, 2012, in Raleigh, North
Carolina.
The debtor filed a voluntary petition for relief under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code on
June 20, 2011. The BA filed a statement of presumed abuse on July 1, 2011. The debtor filed
her amended chapter 7 statement of current monthly income and means-test calculation
(“Official Form”) on July 14, 2011.1 On July 29, 2011, the BA filed the present motion to
dismiss for abuse, pursuant to § 707(b)(1), arguing that the debtor improperly filled out her
SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 11 day of April, 2012.
________________________________________
J. Rich Leonard
United States Bankruptcy Judge
____________________________________________________________
Case 11-04026-8-JRL Doc 40 Filed 04/11/12 Entered 04/11/12 15:01:18 Page 1 of 3

2 It is worth noting that the debtor failed to include her spouse’s income on Schedule I.
2
Official Form, and once corrected, a presumption of abuse would arise, pursuant to § 707(b)(2).
Specifically, the BA contends that debtor took an inappropriate deduction on Line 17 of the
Official Form as a marital adjustment.
Line 17 of the Official Form allows the debtor to deduct income of the debtor’s spouse
that is “NOT paid on a regular basis for the household expenses of the debtor or the debtor’s
dependents.” The debtor is instructed to “specify the basis for excluding the [spouse’s income] .
. . and the amount of income devoted to each purpose.” In this case, the debtor listed the sum of
$3,913.02 on Line 17 as a marital adjustment, providing only the phrase “Husband’s Expenses”
as the basis for the deduction.2 Pursuant to the BA’s request, the debtor provided a breakdown
of the monthly expenses of the non-filing spouse. According to the breakdown provided by the
debtor, the following expenses were included within the amount listed on Line 17: mortgage –
$1,344.02; electricity – $237.00; cable/internet/telephone – $220.00; trash pick-up – $71.00;
home maintenance – $300.00; and household cleaning supplies – $75.00. The BA contends that
these household expenditures, which are paid for by the debtor’s non-filing spouse, are for the
benefit of the debtor and cannot be included within the marital adjustment. Furthermore, the BA
contends that correcting the debtor’s marital adjustment results in a positive monthly disposable
income, and therefore, the presumption of abuse arises in the present case. Neither the debtor
nor debtor’s counsel filed a response to the BA’s motion or appeared at the hearing.
The court finds that the debtor’s Official Form, and more specifically Line 17, was filled
out in a manner that was legally and factually incorrect. This was not a small mistake. The
debtor’s marital adjustment was inflated by thousands of dollars. The court finds that when this
Case 11-04026-8-JRL Doc 40 Filed 04/11/12 Entered 04/11/12 15:01:18 Page 2 of 3

3
miscalculation is corrected, the § 707(b)(2) presumption of abuse applies to this case.
Based on the foregoing and the lack of opposition, the BA’s motion to dismiss for abuse
is ALLOWED, but this dismissal is stayed until such a time as the following action may be
taken—debtor’s counsel, R. Dannette Underwood, is ordered to show cause why she should not
be sanctioned for completing the Official Form in a way that is unwarranted by existing law,
pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9011(c)(1)(B). The hearing on the order to
show cause is set for May 3, 2012 at 11:30 a.m., in Raleigh, North Carolina.
END OF DOCUMENT
Case 11-04026-8-JRL Doc 40 Filed 04/11/12 Entered 04/11/12 15:01:18 Page 3 of 3