Lisa C. Castro

8:08-bk-01135NcebNov 5, 2008

Full text

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
GREENVILLE DIVISION
IN RE:
LISA C. CASTRO,
Debtor. 	Case No. 08-01135-8-JRL
Chapter 13
____________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
This case is before the court on the debtor’s motion for sanctions for creditor misconduct
against EMC Mortgage (“EMC”). On November 4, 2008, the court conducted a hearing on this
matter in Greenville, North Carolina.
The debtor filed for relief under Chapter 13 on February 21, 2008. At the time of filing
bankruptcy the debtor listed in her schedules a secured debt owed to EMC on real property in the
amount of $59,004.54. EMC was sent notice of the bankruptcy filing by a letter dated February
25, 2008. Subsequently, however, the debtor began receiving letters in the mail and phone calls
from EMC seeking mortgage payments. On April 7, 2008, EMC sent a letter to the debtor
stating that her post-petition payment for March was due. Statements received in April, May,
and June also indicated that payments were due. Additionally, the debtor received a letter from
SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 05 day of November, 2008.
________________________________________
J. Rich Leonard
United States Bankruptcy Judge
____________________________________________________________
Case 08-01135-8-RDD Doc 28 Filed 11/05/08 Entered 11/05/08 12:39:39 Page 1 of 3
2
EMC, dated May 22, 2008, demanding mortgage payments.
At hearing, the debtor testified that several of the letters sent by EMC acknowledged the
debtor’s bankruptcy filing and other invoices indicated an attempt to collect a debt. In addition
to EMC’s written demands for payment, the debtor received approximately 120 phone calls from
EMC at home and at work since June 2008. At one point, the debtor’s employer threatened the
debtor with disciplinary action due to the high volume of phone calls she was receiving at work
during this time. The debtor further testified that she received demands for mortgage payments
as recently as October 27, 2008. Finally, the debtor indicated that she made no payments to
EMC after filing for bankruptcy because she surrendered her house at that time. EMC neither
filed a response nor appeared before the court on this matter.
The automatic stay is effective immediately upon the filing of the bankruptcy case and
prohibits all entities from “any act to collect, assess, or recover a claim against the debtor that
arose before the commencement of the case[.]” 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(6). The Bankruptcy Code
provides that “an individual injured by any willful violation of a stay provided by this section
shall recover actual damages, including costs and attorneys’ fees, and, in appropriate
circumstances, may recover punitive damages.” 11 U.S.C. § 362(k)(1). In addition, North
Carolina law prohibits collection agencies from attempting to collect a debt by placing telephone
calls at the consumer’s place of employment when the agency can reach the consumer during
nonworking hours. N.C. GEN . STAT . § 58-70-100(4).
Based on the undisputed record, EMC has repeatedly mailed payment invoices and
placed collection calls to the debtor over the course of approximately seven months. These
impermissible attempts to collect on a debt took place even though EMC was aware that the
Case 08-01135-8-RDD Doc 28 Filed 11/05/08 Entered 11/05/08 12:39:39 Page 2 of 3
3
debtor had filed for bankruptcy protection. Such conduct is a willful and egregious violation of
the automatic stay as well as a violation of state law. The court grants the debtor’s motion for
sanctions, and awards the debtor $5,000.00 in compensatory damages and $5,000.00 in punitive
damages. Additionally, the court awards $2,500.00 in attorneys’ fees to the debtor’s counsel.
“END OF DOCUMENT”
Case 08-01135-8-RDD Doc 28 Filed 11/05/08 Entered 11/05/08 12:39:39 Page 3 of 3

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.