Jason Lee Noel

8:06-bk-00564NcebMay 23, 2006

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WILMINGTON DIVISION
IN RE:
JASON LEE NOEL,
Debtor. Case No. 06-00564-8-JRL
Chapter 7
_____________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
This matter is before the court on the debtor’s motion to set aside. On May 17, 2006, the court
conducted a hearing in Wilmington, North Carolina.
On March 8, 2006, the court entered an order in this case denying the debtor’s motion for
examination by interrogatories in lieu of attending his meeting of creditors. The debtor seeks to have that
order set aside on the grounds that he is currently living outside the state and cannot afford to travel back
to this district for a meeting of creditors. Although the debtor was a resident of this state on the petition
date, he subsequently traveled to Georgia to attend a drug rehabilitation program. After leaving the
program, he moved to Arkansas to live with his parents. He is no longer employed and asserts that the
cost of traveling would be an undue hardship.
SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 23 day of May, 2006.
________________________________________
J. Rich Leonard
United States Bankruptcy Judge
____________________________________________________________
Case 06-00564-8-JRL Doc 26 Filed 05/23/06 Entered 05/23/06 16:30:03 Page 1 of 2
2
Under 11 U.S.C. § 343, a debtor “shall appear and submit to examination under oath at the
meeting of creditors under section 341(a) of this title.” Although a debtor’s attendance is mandatory
under the statute, courts have waived the requirement if the debtor is physically or mentally incapable of
appearing at the meeting. See In re Sullivan, 30 B.R. 781 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1983); In re Stewart, 14 B.R.
959 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1981); In re Edwards, 2 B.R. 103 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1979). If such
circumstances exist, this court has allowed debtors to answer interrogatories in lieu of attending their
meeting of creditors. See In re Clarke, Case No. 05-06188-8-JRL (Bankr. E.D.N.C. Dec. 21, 2005).
The court, however, will not waive a debtor’s personal appearance unless “extreme circumstances” can
be demonstrated. See In re McCrosky, Case No. 03-06317-8-JRL (Bankr. E.D.N.C. Sept. 16, 2003).
The debtor in this case has not made the requisite showing that he is physically or mentally unable
to attend his meeting of creditors. The clerk of court is directed to reschedule the meeting of creditors
pursuant to § 341(a). If the debtor wants his bankruptcy case to proceed in this district, he must appear
at the next scheduled meeting. Accordingly, the debtor’s motion is denied.
“End of Document”
Case 06-00564-8-JRL Doc 26 Filed 05/23/06 Entered 05/23/06 16:30:03 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.