0:26-cv-01721•Payton v. State of Minnesota
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Troy Mike Payton, Petitioner, v. State of Minnesota, Respondent. File No. 26-cv-1721 (ECT/DTS) ORDER Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz issued a Report and Recommendation on March 6, 2026. ECF No. 5. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error.1 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based on all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 5] is ACCEPTED. 2. Petitioner Troy Mike Payton’s Defense Motion for Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 et seq. [ECF No. 1] is DENIED. 3. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 1 The Clerk’s Office twice mailed the Report and Recommendation to Mr. Payton at the Sherburne County Jail. The second time, it was returned with a note indicating that Mr. Payton was “Released from Custody/No Longer at Facility.” See Dkt. The Report and Recommendation was not re-sent because no forwarding address was available. It is Mr. Payton’s responsibility to monitor the docket and proceedings in this case that he initiated. Heiderscheid v. Dakota Cnty. Sheriff’s Off., No. 18-cv-1180 (JNE/LIB), 2020 WL 5106816, at *1 n.1 (D. Minn. Aug. 31, 2020). Mr. Payton has had nearly two months since the Report and Recommendation was issued to contact the Court about the status of his case. He has failed to do so. For these reasons, Mr. Payton’s possible lack of knowledge regarding the case’s status is his responsibility and gives no reason to delay consideration or acceptance of the Report and Recommendation. CASE 0:26-cv-01721-ECT-DTS Doc. 6 Filed 04/30/26 Page 1 of 2
2 4. Payton’s Motion Requesting to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 [ECF No. 2] is DENIED AS MOOT. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: April 30, 2026 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court CASE 0:26-cv-01721-ECT-DTS Doc. 6 Filed 04/30/26 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.