0:26-cv-01037•Braun v. Minnesota Dept. of Corrections et al
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA NATHAN C. BRAUN, Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Civil File No. 26-01037 (MJD/SGE) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Respondents. Nathan C. Braun, pro se. Thomas R. Ragatz, Minnesota Attorney General’s Office, Criminal Appeals, for Respondents. The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Shannon G. Elkins dated March 3, 2026. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. §(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court CASE 0:26-cv-01037-MJD-SGE Doc. 6 Filed 03/30/26 Page 1 of 2
2 adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Elkins dated March 3, 2026. Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Shannon G. Elkins dated March 3, 2026 [Doc. 5]; 2. Petitioner Nathan C. Braun’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [Doc. 1] is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice; 3. Braun’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [Doc. 3] is DENIED as moot; 4. Braun’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Doc. 4] is DENIED as moot; and 5. No certificate of appealability shall issue. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: March 30, 2026 s/Michael J. Davis Michael J. Davis United States District Court CASE 0:26-cv-01037-MJD-SGE Doc. 6 Filed 03/30/26 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.