0:26-cv-00803•Doe v. City of West Richland, The et al
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Jane Doe, Plaintiff, v. City of West Richland, The; Brent Gerry; Selena Smathers; Steven Crown; Stacy Ryan; and Brooke Connor Ehr, Defendants. Case No. 26-CV-00803 (JMB/DTS) ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate David T. Schultz. (Doc. No. 3.) The R&R recommends that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (See id.) Neither party has objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1). In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above- captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (Doc. No. 3) is ADOPTED. 2. The Court dismisses this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: April 1, 2026 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan United States District Court CASE 0:26-cv-00803-JMB-DTS Doc. 4 Filed 04/01/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.