Case Name in Immigration Case - Unavailable

0:26-cv-00573MndJan 27, 2026

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jaiver E.A.C.,
Petitioner,
v.
Pamela Bondi, Attorney General; Kristi
Noem, Secretary, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security; Todd M. Lyons,
Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement; and David
Easterwood, Acting Director, St. Paul
Field Office, U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement,
Respondents.
Civil No. 26-573 (DWF/ECW)
MEMORANDUM
OPINION AND ORDER
INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Jaiver E.A.C.’s petition for a writ of
habeas corpus (“the Petition”). (Doc. No. 1.) Respondents filed a form response
asserting authority to detain Petitioner under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A). (Doc. No. 4.)
For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants the Petition and orders Respondents to
release Petitioner immediately.
BACKGROUND
Petitioner is a citizen of Guatemala and has lived in St. Paul, Minnesota, since
April 2022. (Doc. No. 1 ¶ 18.) He has no criminal history. (Id. ¶ 19.) On January 22,
2026, as Petitioner was leaving his apartment, he was arrested by U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) agents. (Id. ¶ 20.) No warrant was issued for this arrest.
CASE 0:26-cv-00573-DWF-ECW Doc. 6 Filed 01/27/26 Page 1 of 4
2
(See id. ¶ 69.) He is currently being held by ICE in Minnesota without a scheduled
release date. (Id. ¶ 13; Doc. No. 4 at 1.)
The Petition was filed on January 22, 2026. (Doc. No. 1 at 19.) Petitioner asserts
that his detention violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, the
Immigration and Nationality Act, and the Administrative Procedure Act. (Id. ¶¶ 45-63.)
He asks the Court to order his release, or alternatively, order the immigration court to
hold a bond hearing. (Id. at 19.) On January 23, 2026, the Court ordered Respondents to
answer the Petition by January 26, 2026, at 12:00 p.m. CT, and enjoined Respondents
from moving Petitioner from this District pending further order. (Doc. No. 3.)
Respondents timely filed a form response. (Doc. No. 4.)
DISCUSSION
A district court may provide habeas relief to a person who is being detained in
violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(3). That
authority includes jurisdiction to hear habeas challenges to immigration-related detention.
Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 687 (2001); Deng Chol A. v. Barr, 455 F. Supp. 3d 896,
900-01 (D. Minn. 2020). The burden is on the petitioner to prove illegal detention by a
preponderance of the evidence. See Mohammed H. v. Trump, 786 F. Supp. 3d 1149,
1154 (D. Minn. 2025).
Respondents submitted a form response, arguing that Petitioner is subject to
mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A), and pointing the Court to their
arguments in a pending Eighth Circuit case: Avila v. Bondi, No. 25-3248. (Doc. No. 4.)
As this Court has explained on multiple occasions, Respondents’ interpretation of § 1225
CASE 0:26-cv-00573-DWF-ECW Doc. 6 Filed 01/27/26 Page 2 of 4
3
contradicts the plain language of the statute. See Jose L.M.S. v. Bondi, No. 26-cv-474,
2026 WL 185066, at *2 (D. Minn. Jan. 25, 2026); Omar E.F.G. v. Bondi, No. 26-cv-451,
2026 WL 184571, at *2 (D. Minn. Jan. 23, 2026); Victor S.M. v. Noem, No. 26-cv-400,
2026 WL 161445, at *2 (D. Minn. Jan. 21, 2026). Section 1225 applies to “applicants for
admission”—noncitizens who are either “present in the United States who ha[ve] not
been admitted or who arrive[] in the United States.” 8 U.S.C. § 1225(a)(1). Section 1226
applies where § 1225 is inapplicable and provides immigration judges with the discretion
to grant release on bond to noncitizens subject to removal proceedings. See id. § 1226(a).
Here, Petitioner is not an arriving noncitizen because he has already been in the
United States for four years. See Jennings v. Rodriguez, 583 U.S. 281, 289 (2018)
(noting that § 1226(a) applies to “certain aliens already in the country”). Petitioner is
therefore subject to the discretionary bond provisions of § 1226(a), not the mandatory
bond provisions of § 1225(b)(2).
Having found that Petitioner is being detained unlawfully, the question becomes
the correct remedy. A detainee being held pursuant to § 1226(a), as Petitioner is here,
must have been served an arrest warrant prior to detainment. 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a); see also
Ahmed M. v. Bondi, No. 25-cv-4711, 2026 WL 25627, at *3 (D. Minn. Jan. 5, 2026)
(collecting cases). There is no evidence that Respondents had a warrant to arrest
Petitioner. And after being given the opportunity to explain the true cause of Petitioner’s
detainment and provide documents of such (see Doc. No. 3), Respondents did not do so
(see Doc. No. 4). The Court therefore concludes that Petitioner was arrested without a
warrant. The remedy for a warrantless arrest is immediate release. Munaf v. Geren,
CASE 0:26-cv-00573-DWF-ECW Doc. 6 Filed 01/27/26 Page 3 of 4
4
553 U.S. 674, 693 (2008) (“Habeas is at its core a remedy for unlawful executive
detention. The typical remedy for such detention is, of course, release.” (citation
omitted)).
ORDER
Based on the foregoing and the record in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
that:
1. 	Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. [1]) is
GRANTED.
2. 	The Court DECLARES that Petitioner’s current detention is unlawful
under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
3. 	Respondents are ORDERED to release Petitioner from custody
immediately.
4. 	Within three (3) days of the date of this Order, Respondents shall provide
the Court with a status update confirming Petitioner’s release.
5. 	Respondents are directed to release Petitioner with all personal documents
and belongings, such as his driver’s license, passport, other immigration documents, and
cell phone, and without conditions such as ankle monitors or tracking devices.
6. 	Respondents are ENJOINED from re-detaining Petitioner under this same
statutory theory, absent materially changed circumstances.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: January 27, 2026 	s/Donovan W. Frank
DONOVAN W. FRANK
United States District Judge
CASE 0:26-cv-00573-DWF-ECW Doc. 6 Filed 01/27/26 Page 4 of 4

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.