Bewaji v. Falgreen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Olabamidele Olumide Bewaji,
Plaintiff,
v.
Jed Falgreen,
Defendant.
File No. 26-cv-88 (ECT/JFD)
ORDER
This case is before the Court on a Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate
Judge John F. Docherty on January 12, 2026. 	ECF No. 3 (“R&R”). 	Magistrate Judge
Docherty recommends dismissing the action without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A and Rule 12(h)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. R&R at 5. Plaintiff
has filed objections. 	See ECF No. 4. 	Defendant did not respond to the objections. 	See
Dkt. 	Because Plaintiff has objected, the Court is required to review the Report and
Recommendation de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 72.2(b)(3).
The Court has undertaken that de novo review and has concluded that Magistrate Judge
Docherty’s analysis and conclusions are correct.
Therefore, based on the foregoing, and on all the files, records, and proceedings
herein, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. 	The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 3] is ACCEPTED.
2. 	The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in its entirety under
28 U.S.C. § 1915A and Rule 12(h)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and
CASE 0:26-cv-00088-ECT-JFD Doc. 6 Filed 02/18/26 Page 1 of 2

2
3. 	Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [ECF No. 5] is
DENIED AS MOOT.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: February 18, 2026 	s/ Eric C. Tostrud
Eric C. Tostrud
United States District Court
CASE 0:26-cv-00088-ECT-JFD Doc. 6 Filed 02/18/26 Page 2 of 2