Dohrman v. FCI Waseca

1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jacquelin Dohrman,
Petitioner,
v.
FCI Waseca,
Respondent.
No. 25-cv-4794 (KMM/DLM)
ORDER
On December 29, 2025, Petitioner Jacquelin Dohrman filed a Petition for a Writ of
Habeas Corpus alleging that conditions at the Federal Correctional Institution in Waseca,
where she is incarcerated, violated her constitutional rights. (Dkt. 1 at 1.) The following
day, the Clerk of Court informed Ms. Dohrman by letter that she must submit either her
filing fee or an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees within 15 days, or her
case “could be summarily dismissed without prejudice.” (Dkt. 2.) She did neither.
On January 29, 2026, well after the 15-day deadline had passed, United States
Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko filed his Report and Recommendation (R&R) (Dkt. 4)
recommending that the action be dismissed without prejudice under Rule 41(b) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute. No objections have been filed.
Based on the Court’s review, there is no clear error, and the Court adopts the R&R. Nur v.
Olmsted County, 563 F. Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b);
Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)) (stating that a court
reviews an unobjected-to R&R for clear error).
CASE 0:25-cv-04794-KMM-DLM Doc. 5 Filed 03/31/26 Page 1 of 2

2
ORDER
For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. 	The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 4) is
ACCEPTED;
2. 	This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Let judgment be entered accordingly.
Date: March 31, 2026 	s/Katherine M. Menendez
Katherine M. Menendez
United States District Judge
CASE 0:25-cv-04794-KMM-DLM Doc. 5 Filed 03/31/26 Page 2 of 2