0:25-cv-02433•Hagen v. Stenger & Stenger, P.C.
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Carl E. Christensen, Christopher Wilcox, Sydney Maglio, CHRISTENSEN SAMPSEL PLLC, 305 North Fifth Avenue, Suite 375, Minneapolis, MN 55401, for Plaintiff. Patrick D. Newman, BASSFORD REMELE, 100 South Fifth Street, Suite 1500, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for Defendant. Based upon the Report and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster dated December 12, 2025 (Docket No. [28]), along with all the files and records, and because no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. That this action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. DATED: February, 10, 2026 _____/s/ John R. Tunheim_____ at Minneapolis, Minnesota. JOHN R. TUNHEIM United States District Judge RANDALL L. HAGEN, Plaintiff, v. STENGER & STENGER, P.C., Defendant. Civil No. 25-2433 (JRT/DJF) ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CASE 0:25-cv-02433-JRT-DJF Doc. 29 Filed 02/10/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.