Redifer v. Vaught et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Michael Caine Redifer, Sr.,
Petitioner,
v.
T. Vaught, Warden, and FCI Sandstone,
Respondents.
File No. 25-cv-933 (ECT/LIB)
ORDER
Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois issued an Order and Report and Recommendation
on December 29, 2025. 	ECF No. 33. 	No party has objected to that Report and
Recommendation,1 and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b);
Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error,
and based on all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. 	The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 33] is ACCEPTED in full.
2. 	Michael Caine Redifer, Sr.’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus [ECF No. 1]
is DENIED.
3. 	This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: February 10, 2026 	s/ Eric C. Tostrud
Eric C. Tostrud
United States District Court
1 	Petitioner Michael Caine Redifer, Sr. sought an extension of time to file objections
to the Order and Report and Recommendation. ECF No. 34. He was given until February
3, 2026, to file any objections. ECF No. 35. That deadline has passed, and no objections
have been received. See Docket.
CASE 0:25-cv-00933-ECT-LIB Doc. 36 Filed 02/10/26 Page 1 of 1