0:23-cv-02668•Boyd et al v. Target Corp.
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CIVIL MOTION HEARING Harmony DeFlorio, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Target Corp., Defendant. COURT MINUTES BEFORE: Dulce J. Foster U.S. Magistrate Judge Case No: 23-cv-2668 (KMM/DJF) Date: April 27, 2026 Venue: Zoom Video Hearing Court Reporter: Rachel Braun Recording: Zoom Recording Time Commenced: 2:30 P.M. Time Concluded: 3:51 P.M. Time in Court: 1 Hour and 21 Minutes APPEARANCES: Plaintiff: Counsel – Rachel Kristine Tack, Brian Gudmunson, Jason Earley Defendant: Counsel – Ana Tagvoryan, Melanie S. Carter, Fiona Steele PROCEEDINGS: Counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant presented oral argument regarding Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File the First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 157) (“Motion”). For the reasons stated on the record, the Motion was DENIED. ORDER TO BE ISSUED NO ORDER TO BE ISSUED R&R TO BE ISSUED NO R&R TO BE ISSUED Exhibits retained by the Court Exhibits returned to counsel Date: April 27, 2026 /s William Chorba Law Clerk CASE 0:23-cv-02668-KMM-DJF Doc. 175 Filed 04/27/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.