0:16-cv-00384•Roth v. 3M Company et al
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: BAIR HUGGER FORCED AIR MDL No. 15-2666 (JNE/DTS) WARMING DEVICES PRODUCTS ORDER LIABILITY LITIGATION This Document Relates to: Case No. 16-cv-384 (Naomi Roth v. 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.) Case No. 16-cv-545 (Brenda Sanchez, on behalf of the Estate of Robert Andras, Sr. v. 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.) Case No. 16-cv-3242 (Wanda Lantz v. 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.) In a Report and Recommendation dated January 23, 2026, the Honorable David T. Schultz, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that Case Nos. 16-cv-384, 16-cv- 545, and 16-cv-3242 be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. No objection has been filed. Based on a de novo review of the record, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court accepts the recommended disposition [Docket No. 20 in Case No. 16-cv- 384; Docket No. 21 in Case No. 16-cv-545; Docket No. 12 in Case No. 16-cv-3242]. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Case Nos. 16-cv-384, 16-cv-545, and 16-cv-3242 are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: April 10, 2026 s/Joan N. Ericksen JOAN N. ERICKSEN United States District Judge CASE 0:16-cv-00384-JNE-DTS Doc. 21 Filed 04/13/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.