Wireman #476220 v. Corrigan et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
NORTHERN DIVISION
BRANDEN MICHAEL WIREMAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
JAMES CORRIGAN, et al.,
Defendants.
________________________/
Case No. 2:25-cv-224
HON. JANE M. BECKERING
ORDER
This is a civil rights action brought by a state prisoner under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants
Corrigan, Savoie, Cole, and Batho filed a Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim asserting
the affirmative defense of failure to exhaust (ECF No. 14). 	The matter was referred to the
Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on March 2, 2026 (ECF No. 20),
recommending that this Court grant the motion, dismiss without prejudice Plaintiff’s claims
against Defendants Corrigan, Savoie, Cole, and Batho, and terminate this matter. The Report and
Recommendation was duly served on the remaining parties. No objections have been filed. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 20) is
APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Corrigan, Savoie, Cole, and Batho’s
Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 14) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s remaining claims against Defendants
Corrigan, Savoie, Cole, and Batho are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Case 2:25-cv-00224-JMB-SJB ECF No. 22, PageID.<pageID> Filed 04/08/26 Page 1
of 2

2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3)
that an appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith because Plaintiff failed to file any
objections to the Report and Recommendation. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610-
11 (6th Cir. 1997), overruled on other grounds by Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 206, 211-12 (2007).
A Judgment will be entered consistent with this Order.
Dated: April 8, 2026 	/s/ Jane M. Beckering
JANE M. BECKERING
United States District Judge
Case 2:25-cv-00224-JMB-SJB ECF No. 22, PageID.<pageID> Filed 04/08/26 Page 2
of 2