USA v. Echols, et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
KEITH TRAYVON CURTIS,
Defendant.
________________________________/
Hon. Jane M. Beckering
Case No. 1:26-cr-35
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Pursuant to W.D.Mich. LCrR. 11.1, I conducted a plea hearing in the captioned case on
May 19, 2026, after receiving consent of defendant and all counsel in writing and on the record.
At the hearing, defendant Keith Trayvon Curtis entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment
in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement. In Count
1 of the Indictment, defendant is charged with conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to
distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C), and 846. On the basis of the record
made at the hearing, I find that defendant is fully capable and competent to enter an informed plea;
that the plea is made knowingly and with full understanding of each of the rights waived by
defendant; that it is made voluntarily and free from any force, threats, or promises, apart from the
promises in the plea agreement; that the defendant understands the nature of the charge and
penalties provided by law; and that the plea has a sufficient basis in fact.
I therefore recommend that defendant's plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment be
accepted, that the court adjudicate defendant guilty, and that the written plea agreement be
considered for acceptance at the time of sentencing. Acceptance of the plea, adjudication of guilt,
Case 1:26-cr-00035-JMB ECF No. 104, PageID.<pageID> Filed 05/26/26 Page 1 of
2

2
acceptance of the plea agreement, and imposition of sentence are specifically reserved for the
district judge.
Dated: May 26, 2026 	/s/ Sally J. Berens
SALLY J. BERENS
U.S. Magistrate Judge
OBJECTIONS to this Report and Recommendation must be filed with the Clerk of Court
within 14 days of the date of service of this notice. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Failure to file
objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. See
Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).
Case 1:26-cr-00035-JMB ECF No. 104, PageID.<pageID> Filed 05/26/26 Page 2 of
2