1:25-cv-01695•Stevens #946853 v. Hinkley et al
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ROBERT JORY STEVENS, Plaintiff, v. STEVE HINKLEY, et al., Defendants. ____________________________/ Case No. 1:25-cv-1695 Hon. Hala Y. Jarbou ORDER On February 27, 2026, Magistrate Judge Kent issued a report and recommendation that the Court should dismiss the complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. (ECF No. 11). The R&R was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed, and the deadline for doing so expired on March 13, 2026. On review, the Court concludes that the R&R correctly analyzes the issues and makes a sound recommendation. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the R&R (ECF No. 11) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court certifies that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). A judgment will issue in accordance with this Order. Dated: May 15, 2026 /s/ Hala Y. Jarbou HALA Y. JARBOU CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 1:25-cv-01695-HYJ-RSK ECF No. 12, PageID.<pageID> Filed 05/15/26 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ROBERT JORY STEVENS, Plaintiff, v. STEVE HINKLEY, et al., Defendant. ____________________________/ Case No. 1:25-cv-1695 Hon. Hala Y. Jarbou JUDGMENT In accordance with the order entered this date: IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED. Dated: May 15, 2026 /s/ Hala Y. Jarbou HALA Y. JARBOU CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 1:25-cv-01695-HYJ-RSK ECF No. 12, PageID.<pageID> Filed 05/15/26 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.