1:25-cv-00757•Blaylock #895020 v. Burgess et al
Full text
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JAMES BLAYLOCK, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL BURGESS, et al., Defendants. ____________________________/ Case No. 1:25-cv-757 Hon. Hala Y. Jarbou ORDER On April 24, 2026, Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R) that the Court deny Defendant Boerema’s motion for summary judgment. (R&R, ECF No. 22.) The R&R was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed, and the deadline for doing so has expired. On review, the Court concludes that the R&R correctly analyzes the issues and makes a sound recommendation. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the R&R (ECF No. 22) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Boerema’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 15) is DENIED. Dated: May 11, 2026 /s/ Hala Y. Jarbou HALA Y. JARBOU CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 1:25-cv-00757-HYJ-MV ECF No. 23, PageID.<pageID> Filed 05/11/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.