1:24-cv-01292•Tubbs #292944 v. Wakefield et al
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DANYALE SHARRON TUBBS, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN WAKEFIELD, et al., Defendants. ________________________/ Case No. 1:24-cv-1292 HON. JANE M. BECKERING ORDER This is a civil rights action brought by a state prisoner under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants Wakefield and Jacoutot filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on the ground that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies (ECF No. 16). The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 25) on October 24, 2025, recommending that this Court deny the motion. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the remaining parties. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 25) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 16) is DENIED. The case proceeds as to Plaintiff’s excessive force claims against Defendants Wakefield and Jacoutot relating to the use of the restraint chair on September 26, 2022. Dated: December 1, 2025 /s/ Jane M. Beckering JANE M. BECKERING United States District Judge Case 1:24-cv-01292-JMB-MV ECF No. 28, PageID.<pageID> Filed 12/01/25 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.