1:22-cv-00336•Hamilton v. Vorce et al
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ALEXANDER HAMILTON, Plaintiff, v. CHAD VORCE, et al., Defendants. _______________________/ Case No. 1:22-cv-336 HON. JANE M. BECKERING ORDER This is a civil action. Defendants City of DeWitt, Clyde Smith, and Bruce Ferguson filed a Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 32). Defendant Chad Vorce also filed a Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 54). The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 58) on December 12, 2025, recommending that the motions be granted and that this case be dismissed with prejudice. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties that have appeared to date. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF. No. 58) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 32 & 54) are GRANTED for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A Judgment will be entered consistent with this Order. Dated: January 6, 2026 /s/ Jane M. Beckering JANE M. BECKERING United States District Judge Case 1:22-cv-00336-JMB-RSK ECF No. 59, PageID.<pageID> Filed 01/06/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.