USA v. ROSSIGNOL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
BENJAMIN A. ROSSIGNOL, 	)
)
Petitioner, 	)
)
v. 	) 	1:14-cr-00033-JAW
) 	1:18-cv-00133-JAW
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 	)
)
Respondent. 	)
ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION ON 28 U.S.C. § 2255 MOTION
The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on July 6, 2018 his
Recommended Decision (ECF No. 66). 	The Petitioner filed his objections to the
Recommended Decision on July 17, 2018 (ECF No. 67).
The Court reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended
Decision, together with the entire record. The Court made a de novo determination
of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, and
concurs with the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth
in his Recommended Decision and for the reasons set forth in this Order, and the
Court determines that no further proceeding is necessary.
1. 	It 	is 	therefore 	ORDERED 	that 	the 	Recommended 	Decision 	of 	the
Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 66) be and hereby is AFFIRMED.
2. 	It is further ORDERED that the Benjamin A. Rossignol’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Petition (ECF No. 60) be and hereby is DENIED.
Case 1:14-cr-00033-JAW Document 69 Filed 01/16/19 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>

2
3. 	It is further ORDERED that no certificate of appealability should issue
in the event the Benjamin A. Rossignol files a notice of appeal because
there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right
within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
SO ORDERED.
/s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr.
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 16th day of January, 2019
Case 1:14-cr-00033-JAW Document 69 Filed 01/16/19 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>