0:08-ap-00709•U.S. Postal Service FCU v. Lalangan et al
Full text
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND at Greenbelt IN RE: : : ROLANDO LALANGAN : Case No. 08-16298PM EVANGELINA LALANGAN : Chapter 7 : Debtors : - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : U.S. POSTAL SERVICE FCU : Plaintiff : vs. : Adversary No. 08-0709PM : ROLANDO LALANGAN : EVANGELINA LALANGAN : Defendants : - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : MEMORANDUM OF DECISION This bankruptcy case under Chapter 7 was filed on May 6, 2008. The Meeting of Creditors held pursuant to § 341 of the Bankruptcy Code was concluded on June 12, 2008. On July 14, 2008, on the Motion of the U.S. Postal Service Federal Credit Union, the court granted an Order extending the time for filing objections to exemptions and for filing an objection to Debtors’ discharge to an including September 3, 2008. The Complaint before the court, pleaded in two counts to dismiss or convert this case and to determine dischargeability of debt, was filed September 23, 2008. The Complaint is time barred. The objection to the dischargeability of a debt under Bankruptcy Rule 4007(c) must be filed no later than 60 days after the first date set for the Meeting of Creditors under § 341(a), or within an extension procured by motion filed within that time period. While a debtor may forfeit Date signed November 18, 2008 Entered: November 19, 2008 Case 08-00709 Doc 11 Filed 11/19/08 Page 1 of 2
the benefit of the time limitation, Kontrick v. Ryan, 540 U.S. 443 (2004), all debtor need do is raise this issue of limitations prior to the court’s reaching the merits of the objection. Debtors acted timely here and filed a motion to dismiss in lieu of an answer. While the court extended the time for filing certain complaints to September 3, 2008, in all events, this Complaint was untimely filed. Likewise, the Complaint to dismiss or convert the case as an abuse of the provisions of Chapter 7 is similarly untimely. Under Interim Bankruptcy Rule 1017(e)(1) such a complaint must have been filed within the same period as complaints objecting to discharge or dischargeability of debts. An appropriate order will be entered. cc: Craig L. Holcomb, Esq., 51 Monroe Street, Suite 1405, Rockville, MD 20850 Stephen Greenfield, Trustee, 7910 Woodmont Avenue, Suite 760, Bethesda, MD 20814 Kasey I. Edwards, Esq., 8201 Corporate Drive, Suite 1140, Landover, MD 20785 Rolando/Evangelina Lalangan, 1123 Bohac Lane, Accokeek, MD 20607 End of Memorandum Case 08-00709 Doc 11 Filed 11/19/08 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.