Barry Reynolds and Diane Reynolds

1:08-bk-10775MabJul 21, 2010

Full text

In re
BARRY REYNOLDS and
DIANE REYNOLDS,
Debtors
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
EASTERN DIVISION
Chapter 7
Case No. 08-10775-FJB
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON
DEBTORS’ MOTION TO DETERMINE TAX LIABILITY TO IRS
Debtors Diane Reynolds and Barry Reynolds have moved for a determination of their
federal income tax liability for tax years 2000 through 2007. By this motion, the Debtors
essentially object to the proof of claim filed by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in this case 1
on the basis that the IRS has never adduced, in support of its claim, the signed records of
assessment on which the alleged liability is predicated. Accordingly, they seek in the first
instance only an order directing the IRS to provide signed records of assessment for the tax
years in question. The IRS responds that only tax years 2000 through 2003 are at issue, those
being the only years for which it has filed a proof of claim, and that it has provided the Debtors
with Certificates of Assessment, Payment, and Other Specified Matters (Form 4340) for those
years, which Forms 4340, they argue, are dispositive of the Debtors’ tax liability for the years in
question, making the underlying records of assessment unnecessary. The Debtors articulate no
specific challenge to the IRS’s proof of claim other than that the IRS has never adduced the
signed assessment certificates on which the proof of claim is predicated.
The Court agrees with the IRS. The IRS’s proof of claim in this case is based entirely on
liability for tax years 2000 through 2003; the Debtors have offered no reason for addressing
later years. As to the relevant years, the IRS has adduced Forms 4340 showing liability
consistent with the amounts set forth in the proof of claim; the Debtors do not deny this. Finally,
1 The IRS filed an original proof of claim and two amendments thereto. By the most recent
amendment, the IRS asserts a claim in the total amount of $30,970.57, including a secured claim in the
amount of $20,159.81 and a nonpriority unsecured claim in the amount of $10,810.76.
Case 08-10775 Doc 604 Filed 07/21/10 Entered 07/21/10 17:26:44 Desc Main
Document Page 1 of 2
Form 4340 is, as the IRS argues, “presumptive proof of a valid assessment” and is “routinely
used to prove that tax assessment has in fact been made.” Geiselman v. United States, 961
F.2d 1,6 (1st Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 891 (1992). This is sufficient evidence, and
nothing more need be adduced. The Debtors’ objection to the IRS’s proof of claim, as
amended, is accordingly overruled, and the IRS claim, as amended, is allowed 	A separate
order will enter accordingly.
Date: July 21, 2010 	_______________________________
Frank J. Bailey
United States Bankruptcy Judge
2
Case 08-10775 Doc 604 Filed 07/21/10 Entered 07/21/10 17:26:44 Desc Main
Document Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.