USA v. Williams

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
UNITED STATES
Plaintiff,
v.
NATASHA WILLIAMS (01),
Defendant.
Case No. 23-20026-01-DDC-TJJ
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Defendant Natasha Williams has asked the court to terminate her term of supervised
release early. Doc. 42. Yet this court transferred jurisdiction over Ms. Williams’s supervised
release to the District of South Carolina in February 2025. Doc. 40. And our court has held that
“once the transfer is effected, the transferor court no longer has jurisdiction to exercise the
powers that may be exercised by the transferee court.” United States v. Wallace, No. 07-20168-
13-JWL, 2025 WL 1040979, at *1 (D. Kan. Apr. 8, 2025) (collecting authorities). This court—
the transferor court—thus lacks jurisdiction to decide Ms. Williams’s motion.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT defendant Natasha
Williams’s Motion for Early Termination (Doc. 42) is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 22nd day of April, 2026, at Kansas City, Kansas.
s/ Daniel D. Crabtree______
Daniel D. Crabtree
United States District Judge
Case 2:23-cr-20026-DDC-TJJ Document 43 Filed 04/24/26 Page 1 of 1