1:84-F-00610•IN RE: Administration of Antipsychotic Drugs to Robert F. Timmell
IN RE: Administration of Antipsychotic Drugs to Robert F. Timmell
1:84-F-00610JpmlJun 1, 2015
Full text
. . Case MDL No. 610 Document’2. Filed 06/01/15 Page 1 of 2 Co J DEL oy ERTS IRIEELITIDATION FLED C SEP 26 1584 PATRICIA 0. Hogiind DOCKET NO. 610 v BE THEPANEL BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION oe + IN RE ADMINISTRATION OF ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUGS TO ROBERT F. TIMMEL . ORDER DENYING TRANSFER This litigation consists of eight actions pending in eight + federal districts: one action each in the District of Connecticut, District of Rhode Island, Central District of California, Southern District of California, Northern District of Florida, Middle Dis- trict of Pennsylvania, Western District of Texas and Western District of Washington. The plaintiff in all eight actions hds moved the Panel to centralize the actions, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407, in the Southern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. Seven defendants in six of the actions before the Panel oppose transfer. - On the basis of the papers filed and the hearing held, we find that Section 1407 transfer would neither serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses nor further the Just and efficient con- duct of the litigation. While the actions may share some questions of fact relating to the patient's condition and his treatment, the alleged conduct of the defendants in each action raises factual questions predominantly unique to each action. Suitable alterna- : . tives to a Section 1407 transfer, such as filing or cross-filing- notices for a particular deposition in all actions or seeking use of common discovery in all applicable actions, are available to the parties. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407 to centralize the actions listed on the attached Schedule A be, and the same hereby 1s, DENIED. . | FOR THE PANEL: oo Andrew A. Caffrey Chairman
Co. Case MDL No. 610 Document 2: Filed 06/01/15 Page 2 of 2 SCHEDULE A C MDL-610 -- IN RE ADMINISTRATION OF ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUGS co CeTO ROBERT F. TIMMEL : Central District of California Robert F. Timmel v. Gene Moss, M.D./College Hospital Inc., C.A. No. 8U-0592-JMI (Bx) District of Connecticut Robert F. Timmel v. Steven P. Gersten, M.D., C.A. No. H-84-81 Northern District of Florida Robert F. Timmel v. Frank E. Gili, M.D., C.A. No. PCA-84-4027 WEA Middle District of Pennsylvania - Robert F. Timmel v. Tan Osborn, M.D., C.A. No. 84-0124 District of Rhode Island C Robert F. Timmel v. John T. Carr, M.D./Newport Hos ital, C.A. No. 84-0040 . Western District of Texas Robert F. Timmel v. Lyman Phillips, M.D., C.A. No. A-84-CA-043 Western District of Washington Robert F. Timmel v. Ben Kuhner, M.D., C.A. No. C-84-92 Southern District of California Robert F. Timmel v. John P. Feighner, M.D./Sabah Chammas, M.D./San Luis Rey Hospital, C.A. No. 84-021i6-T (M)
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.