1:81-F-00492•IN RE: Hoffacker Bicycle Seat Patent and Trademark Litigation
IN RE: Hoffacker Bicycle Seat Patent and Trademark Litigation
1:81-F-00492JpmlMay 19, 2015
Full text
Case MDL No. 492 Document 2 Filed 05/19/15 Page 1 of 2AR TAY Growth dete . : FELTEISTRICT HIBCATLH : _ TR Lo RE DOCKET NO. 492 MAR -8 1387 Ce BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATIGRIICS Boillo io ER CLERK CF THE PANIL RP IN RE HOFFACKER BICYCLE SEAT PATENT AND TRADEMARK LITIGATION | :y IN ORDER DENYING TRANSFER * KA : Presently before the Panel is a motion, pursuant to Tr 28 U.S.C. §1407, brought by the plaintiffs in the actions ERTS listed on the attached Schedule A for transfer of the action a” Lo pending in the District of Colorado to the Middle District : EI of Florida for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings i. with the actions pending there. : oo On the basis of the papers submitted, +’ we find that Ny Section 1407 transfer. would neither serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses nor further the just and efficient conduct of the litigation. Given the minimal number of actions before us, movants have failed to persuade us that ~ B . any common questions of fact involved in these actions are Sn sufficiently complex, and that the accompanying discovery ne will be so time-consuming, as to justify Section 1407 transfer. See In re Scotch Whiskey Antitrust Litigation, 299 F. Supp. S43, 544 (J.P.M.L. 1969). Furthermore, we point out that : suitable alternatives to transfer exist in order to minimize ; the possibility of duplicative discovery and/or conflicting : pretrial rulings. See, e.g., In re Eli Lilly and Company : (Cephalexin Monohydrate) Patent Litigation, 446 F. Supp. : 242, 244 (J.P.M.L. 1978). See also Manual for Complex : Litigation, Parts I and II, §§3.11 (rev. ed. 1977). . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion for transfer pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407 be, and the same hereby is, CL DENIED. . . FOR THE PANEL: Cr Andrew A. Caffrey Chairman * Judges Roy W. Harper and Sam C. Pointer, Jr. took no part So in the decision of this matter. 1/ The parties waived oral argument and accordingly the question of transfer of these actions under Section 1407 was submitted on the briefs. Rule 14, R.P.J.P.M.L., 89 F.R.D. 273, 283-84 (1981).
« . 8% : Case MDL No. 492 Document2 Filed 05/19/15 Page 2 of 2 Schedule A é MDL-492 -- In re Hoffacker Bicycle Seat Patent and Trademark ) Litigation ’ District of Colorado Neal D. Hoffacker, et al. v. Bike House, et al., ~C.A. No. 81-K-907 . Middle District of Florida Neal D. Hoffacker, et al. v. Bike House, et al., C.A. No. 81-124(B)-0Orl-Civ-R . Neal D. Hoffacker, et al. v. Bike House, et al, C.A. No. 81-124(RA)-Or1-Civ-R
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.