IN RE: Cole Patent Litigation

© Case MDLNo. 401 Document2 Filed 05/18/15 Page 1 of 2
| HITED SRS ARE
RET oy Co
Cry boo
| “ri, 7)Pat. 79 YlCeri an ya, . fe BI
ER VS CL
DOCKET NO. 401 Aer
BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
IN RE COLE PATENT LITIGATION oo . .
TRANSFER ORDER
All parties to the actions listed on the attached Schedule
A either agree on the desirability of or do not oppose transfer
of the action pending in the Central District of California
to the District of Delaware for coordinated or consolidated CC
pretrial proceedings with the actions pending there. The 1/ Coe
Panel has found upon consideration of the papers submitted= ~ ERT Co
that these actions involve common questions of fact and CL
that transfer will serve the convenience of the parties Srand witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct
of this litigation. Co
“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Lo
§1407, the action listed on the attached Schedule A and
pending in the Central District of California be, and the So
same hereby is, transferred to the District of Delaware ol | So
and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable :Walter K. Stapleton for coordinated or consolidated pretrial
proceedings with the actions pending in that district and
listed on Schedule A.
% PANEL:
Jory unten	Murray I&/Gurfein :
: Chairman
1/ The parties waived oral argument and, accordingly,
the question of transfer of these actions under Section
1407 was submitted on the briefs. Rule 14, R.P.J.P.M.L.,78 F.R.D. 561, 572 (1978).

Case MDL No. 401 Document 2 Filed 05/18/15 Page 2 of 2
a
o SCHEDULE A
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Lear Siegler, Inc. v. RCA Corporation Civil Action
No. CV79-1929-R
DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
RCA Corporation v. Applied Digital Data Civil Action
Systems, Inc. : No. 78-198
RCA Corporation v. Hazeltine Civil Action
Corporation No. 79-243