IN RE: Air Crash Disaster at Philadelphia International Airport on June 23, 1976

1:78-F-00364JpmlMay 4, 2015

Full text

Case MDL No. 364 Document 2 Filed 05/04/15 Page 1 of 2
o DOCKET NO. 364 Cm rasBEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION	= “=
IN RE AIR CRASH DISASTER AT PHILADELPHIA INTERNATIONAL BEC 23 10
AIRPORT ON JUNE 23, 1976 pe
or Ye Ye : ~ i a.TRANSFER ORDER TERR	AE TR
It appearing that all parties to the actions listed on
the attached Schedule A agree on the desirability of or do
not oppose transferring the actions pending in districts other
than the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to that district for
coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to
28 U.S.C. §1407 with the actions pending in that district before
the Honorable Clarence C. Newcomer, and the. Panel having found
upon consideration of the papers submitted	&/ that these actions
involve common questions of fact and that transfer will serve :
the convenience of the parties and witnesses ang promote the
just and efficient conduct of this litigation, 2/ :
IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407, the actionslisted on the attached Schedule A and pending in districts
other than the Eastern District of Pennsylvania be, and the Losame hereby are, transferred	to that district and, with the Bg
consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Clarence C. :
Newcomer for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings !with the actions pending in that district and listed on
L Schedule A. :
FOR THE PANEL: |
- oo John Minor Wisdom Co
: Chairman
1/7 The parties waived their right to oral argument and,
accordingly, the question of transfer of these actions under
Section 1407 was submitted on the briefs. Rule 14, R.P.J.P.M.L., H
/8 F.R.D. 561, 572 (1978). | Hi
2/ Two other actions, James L. Levie, et al. v. Allegheny ;Airlines, Inc., et al., D. Maryland, C.A. No. N78=1074 and £
: Isaac Steinharter v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc., E.D. |Pennsylvania, C.A. No. 78-1973, were originally included in §
this docket but were terminated in their respective district :
courts prior to the entry of this order. Accordingly, Panel i i
| consideration of those two actions is now moot. !‘ i
Yew i.- I
H
Case MDL No. 364 Document 2 Filed 05/04/15 Page 2 of 2
DOCKET NO. 364 :
SCHEDULE A |
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Civil Action No. |
David Radford v. Allegheny Airlines H78-354 Co
Inc. :
EASTERN DISTRICT	OF PENNSYLVANIA |
Gregory Lima v. Allegheny Airlines, 78-3192
Inc.
Raymond Auletta, Jr. v. Allegheny 78-2036
Airlines, Inc. !
John H. Cooper v. Allegheny Airlines, 78-3045 :
Inc. : |
oo
James E. Bruce, et al. v. Allegheny 77-2522 :
Airlines, Inc. !
John M. Nees, et al. v. Allegheny 77-3712
Airlines, Inc. Ege
C Steven J. Camara v. Allegheny Airlines, 78-392 |	Inc.
3 oo
John Kelley, et al. v. Allegheny 78-871 |	Airlines, Inc.
a
James Shafer, et al. v. Allegheny 78-1475 |Airlines, Inc. ;
Harold D. Connelly,	‘et al. v. Allegheny 78-1688 |
Airlines, Inc. |
Richard Berryman, et al. v. Allegheny 78-1841 |Airlines, Inc.
Elizabeth Patton, et al. v. Allegheny 78-2044 : |
Airlines, Inc. :
Spencer Struble v. Allegheny 78-2057 f
Airlines, Inc.
|
Richard W. Schumacher, et al. v. 78-2065 a
AlTegheny Airlines, Inc.
‘Henry Brackman v. Allegheny Airlines, 78-2097 :
A |
| DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND |
Frederick P. Warrender v. Allegheny CA77-0482 |
Airlines, Inc.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.