IN RE: Immigration Quota Litigation

1:78-F-00363JpmlMay 4, 2015

Full text

Case MDL No. 363 Document 2 Filed 05/04/15 Paget of.2
nile
et ENE,
| oly CTs: CA TO PR
: “Ean <p . )EC oo
DOCKET NO. 363 RE Po
| Gays
BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEI: ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION EE
IN RE IMMIGRATION QUOTA LITIGATION
ORDER DENYING TRANSFER AS MOOT Lo BE
On June 14, 1979, the first two causes of action in the Co
California action listed on the attached Schedule A were
dismissed, and summary judgment was entered in favor of
defefidants on the third, and final, cause of action. . Thus,
only a single action remains in this litigation, and consideration
of the question of transfer under 28 U.S.C. §1407 in this
litigation has become moot.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion for transfer oo
- under Section 1407 in this litigation be, and the same hereby
is, DENIED as MOOT.
FOR THE RY
HsHoyTae—. GurfeinChairman
SE Case MDL No. 363 Document 2 Filed 05/04/15 Page 2 of 2
DOCKET NO. 363
Schedule A
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Civil Action No.
Imelda Contreas	de Avila, et al. v. 78-C-1166
Griffin Bell, et al.
CENTRAL, DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Juan Ceja, et al. v. Leonal Castillo, 78-2587-MML
et al.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.