1:76-F-00259•IN RE: Florida Real Estate (Rolling Hills of Ocala, Ltd.) Securities Litigation
IN RE: Florida Real Estate (Rolling Hills of Ocala, Ltd.) Securities Litigation
1:76-F-00259JpmlMay 4, 2015
Full text
Case MDL No. 259 Document 2 Filed Mths Frage lof2 DOCKET NO. JOT TT . VLLT LD ST UTGATOH ; SPEER . BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION: ‘J CR IN RE FLORIDA REAL ESTATE (ROLLING HILLS OF ocALAUCIRE.!S75 | : a. SECURITIES LITIGATION : i PAVIA WIRD : TRANSFER ORDER CLZRA GF THI PANEL IEE vy 797 It appearing that all parties to the actions §laé/7%listed on the following Schedule A agree on the = 4 desirability of transferring the action pending in the a Eastern District of Pennsylvania to the Southern District of Florida for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407 with the actions pending in that district before the Honorable Norman C. : : Roettger, Jr., and the panel haying found upon consid- eration of the papers submitted that these actions involve common questions of fact and that transfer will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of this litigation, IT IS ORDERED that the action listed on the following : Schedule A and pending in the Eastern District of EE Pennsylvania be, and the same hereby is, transferred to Co - co the Southern District of Florida and, with the consent Cone of that court, assigned to the Honorable Norman C. Co Roettger, Jr. for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407 with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. : 1/Plaintiffs in the Pennsylvania action and several defendants in the Pennsylvania and Florida actions oo failed to respond to the motion for transfer, and thus E they are deemed to have acquiesced to the action re- guested in the motion. See Rule 7, R.P.J.P.M.L., 65 : F.R.D. 253, 258 (1975). - 2/None of the parties was present when this matter was called at the Panel's hearing held in Chicago, Illinois, on July 23, 1976, and thus the matter was deemed submitted for decision on the basis of the papers filed. See Rule 14, R.P.J.P.M.L., 65 F.R.D. 253, 264 (1975). FR "THE PANEL: : 1 . ' John Minor Wisdom Chairman
Case MDL No. 259 Document 2 Filed 05/04/15 Page 2 of 2 ® ’ SCHEDULE A DOCKET NO. 259 -- In re Florida Real Estate (Rolling Hills of Ocala, Ltd.) Securities Litigation EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Melwyn L. Pasternack, et al. v. Rolling Civil Action Hills of Ocala, Ltd., et al. No. 76-576 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA | David G. Pinosky v. Edward Gadinsky, Civil Action et al. ) No. 76-117~Civ-NCR Joseph Bonaccurso v. Edward Gadinsky, Civil Action et al. No. 76-461-Civ~-NCR Bevar Realty Corp. v. Edward Gadinsky, Civil Action et al. No. 76-458-Civ-NCR Peter Palmarozza, et al. v. Edward Civil Action ) Gadinsky, et al. No. 76-462-Civ-~NCR Irving Gelman, D.D.S., P.A. v. Edward Civil Action ] Gadinsky, et al. No. 76-455-Civ-NCR Terrence R. Malloy, M.D. v. Edward Civil Action Gadinsky, et al. No. 76-460-Civ~NCR Howard K. Clough, M.D. v. Edward Civil Action Gadinsky, et al. No. 76-457-Civ-NCR Clyde A. Maugher v. Edward Gadinsky, Civil Action et al. No. 76-469-Civ-NCR Joseph Coluzzi v. Edward Gadinsky, Civil Action et al. - No. 76~-456-Civ-~NCR Roy N. Rogers v. Edward Gadinsky, Civil Action et al. No. 76-459-Civ-NCR
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.