IN RE: Chicken "Broiler" Antitrust Litigation

Case MDL No. 237 Document 2 Filed 05/01/15 Page 1 of 3
* -* MP E
| so JUDICIA PANEL ON
DOCKET NO. 237 MULTIONS	TRICT LITIGATION
: FED
BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIEARIAN 1075
. He mee PATRIC!	AD HDWARD
IN RE CHICXEN "BROILER ANTITRUST LITIGATION CLERR GF THE PANEL
TRANSFER ORDER
In light of the fact that all parties generally agree
on the desirability of Section 1407 treatment for tnis
litigation, and upon consideraticn of the papers submitted,
the Panel has found that the action listed on the attached
Scnedule A pending in the Southern District of New York
involves common questions of fact with those actions
pending in the Northern District of Georgia, and that
transiex of this sole action to the Northern District of
Georgia for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings
will serve the convenience of the parties and thelr witnesses
and further the just and efficient disposition oi this
litigation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDZRED that the ‘action listed on the
attached Schedule A and pending in the Southern District =
cf New York be, and the same hereby is, transferred to tae
Northern District of Georgia and, with the consent of that~oym assi o Lh ~~ =a . . Fan
court, assigned to the Honorable William C. O'Kelley 0%- coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceearngs pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. §1407 with the actions pending in that district
and also listed on the attacned Schedule A.
FOR THE PANEL: :
N ) oy H
LC Ny g ix =: } AAT o A oo
SE aL
John Minor Wisdon
we Chairman

Case MDL No. 237 Document 2 Filed 05/01/15 Page 20f3
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORX
City of New York, et al. v. Cargill, Inc., Civil Action
et al. No. 75 Civ. 4179
. NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
The State of Connecticut v. National Civil Action
Broiler Marketing Assn., et al. No. C74-1257A
Purity Supreme, Inc. v. National Broiler Civil Action
Marketing Assn., et al. No. C74-1557A
ctzte of Rhode Island v. National Broiler Civil Action
Marketing Assn., et al. No. C74-1594a
State of Florida v. National Broiler Civil Action
varketing Assn., et al. ‘No. C74-15985A
state of Colorado v. National Broiler Civil Action
Marketing Assn., et al. No. C74-1632A
Commonwealth of Virginia v. National Civil Action
3roiler Marketing Assn., et al. No. C74-1654A
gtate of Alabama v. National Broiler Civil Action
Marketing Assn., et al. No. C74-17832
state of Missouri v. National Broiler Civil Action
Marketing Assn.,.et al. No. C74-182%2
State of Towa v. National Broiler Civil Action
Marketing Assn., et al. No. C74-2032a
: The State of New York v. National Civil Action
Broiler Marketing Assn., et.al. No. C74-2044A
Ambassador East Hotel, et al. v. National Civil Action
Marketing Assn., et al. No. C74~-2204%
State of Oklahoma v. National Broiler Civil Action :
Marketing Assn., et al. No. C74-2131A
' State of Michigan v. National Broiler Civil Action
. Assn., et al. No. C74-2366A ‘
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. National Civil Action
Broiler Marketing Assn., et al. No. C74-2330A

oo Case MDL No. 237 Document 2 Filed 05/01/15 Page 3 of 3
. a |
ve ud ‘
NO. LRN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA (cont'd)
State of Kentucky v. National Broiler Civil Action
Marketing Assn., et al. No. C75-7CA
State of Ohio v. National Broiler Civil Action
Marketing Assn., et al. No. C75-71A
State of Louisiana v. National Broiler Civil Action
Marketing Assn., et al. No. C75-1522a
State of New Jersey v. National Broiler : Civil Action
Marketing Assn., et al. No. C75-362A
Louis Migliaccio, et al. v. National ‘Civil Action
Broiler Marketing Assn., et al. No. C75-107%A
State of Illinois v. National Broiler .Civil Action
Marketing Assn., et al. No. C75~-1294A
Kentucky Fried Chicken of Mattoon, Ill., Civili Action
Inc. v. National Broiler Marketing Assn., No. C75-12S3A
et al.
Bal Harbour Hotel Corp., et al. wv. - Civil Action
National Broiler Marketing Assn.,et al. No. C74-2204A