1:71-F-00095•IN RE: Air Crash Disaster at Anchorage, Alaska, on November 27, 1970
IN RE: Air Crash Disaster at Anchorage, Alaska, on November 27, 1970
1:71-F-00095JpmlMay 1, 2015
Full text
Case MDL No. 95 Document 2 Filed 05/01/15 Page 1 of 4 | LI NET 2 44, RA ee OY 1 ® BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL il ERE Fy ON oe MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION APR 2g 197 IN RE AIR CRASH DISASTER AT ) Cen sy ANCHORAGE, ALASKA ON ) DOCKET NO. 95 NOVEMBER 27, 1970 ) OPINION AND ORDER BEFORE ALFRED P. MURRAH, CHAIRMAN AND JOHN MINOR WISDOM, EDWARD WEINFELD, EDWIN A. ROBSON*, WILLIAM H. BECKER, JOSEPH S. LORD, III*, AND STANLEY A. WEIGEL, JUDGES: OF THE PANEL } PER CURIAM On November 27, 1970, a military charter flight operated by Capitol International Airways enroute to Vietnam crashed near [ Anchorage, Alaska. Forty-six passengers and one crew member were fatally injured, eighteen persons were seriously injured and thirty-four sustained minor injuries. Three cases arising out of this crash are now pending in three different districts. On its own initiative the Panel has considered transfer of these actions to a single district for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. After considering the responses of the parties and the arguments presented at hearing, we decline to order transfer at this time. Our decic’' =n "¢ ill.out prejudice to the right of any party to move for transf.. at a later time or of the Panel to reconsider transfer on its own initiative. * Although Judges hizo: and rd were unable to attend the hearing, they have, with +he or acer of the parties, participated in this decision.
Case MDL No. 95 Document 2 Filed 05/01/15 Page 2 of 4 | - 2 - .- . d ® Not all parties to these actions have responded to the order to show cause,” but all those who have responded, including Oklahoma plaintiffs and many of the defendants in the Oklahoma actions, favor transfer to a single district. Three of the Oklahoma defendants, Capitol International Airways, C.I.T. Corp. and Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. have also indicated their preference for the Western District of Oklahoma as transferee district. They urge that the eyewitnesses to the crash, the survivors and the defen- dants are scattered across the country and that the Western District of Oklahoma is a central geographical forum in which this litigation might be consolidated. The Oklahoma plaintiffs and the other defendants, McDonnell-Douglas, The Bendix Corp., Firestone Tire and Rubber and Hydro-Aire, are also agreeable to 8 selection of that district as transferee district. Although we think it clear that these cases do share common questions of fact concerning the events surrounding the crash, there are too few actions at this point to justify transfer to a single district for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. Because of the large number of fatalities and serious injuries resulting from this crash, additional actions on behalf of passengers and crew members are expected. Many of these will be filed an’ procersed in the state courts, but it is likely that at least scme of the additional actions will be filed in the United States District Courts throughout the county. We think it premature to decide the question of transfer an to ] _1/ No response has been received rom plaintiff in the © 'hernDistrict of New York action.
Case MDL No. 95 Document2 Filed 05/01/15 Page 3 of 4 _ 3 _ ’ <r . 920 choose the transferee district until more actions have been filed. This decision should not prevent the parties from voluntarily cooperating in the preparation of the presently pending cases for an early trial. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that transfer of the actions listed on the attached Schedule A be, and hereby is, DENIED, without prejudice to the right of any party to move for transfer at a later time or of the Panel to consider transfer at a later time on its own initiative. : QD t ]
Case MDL No. 95 Document 2 Filed 05/01/15 Page 4 of 4 QQ scizoui: 2 DOCKET NO. 95 EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA Clyde D. Covey, etc. v. C.I.T. Corporation, Civil Action et al. No. 71-124 WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA Bill R. Conway v. C.I.T. Corporation; Civil Action et al. No. CIV-71-454 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Claude C. Turner, etc. v. Capitol International Civil Action Airways, Inc., et al. -No. 71 Civ. 4709 []
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.