IN RE: Government Auto Fleet Sales Antitrust Litigation

ro
2
[=] .
£10 F- :
RB Co	Date Qa
"X2/22/70 I J "SHOW CAUSE ENTERED. Wailed to Counsel of Record and Involved Judges |
12/31/70 | | ORDER striking S.D. N.Y. No. 70 Civ. 1535 from Schodule A of SCO,
1/4/71 Extension of Time request from Chrysler Corp.
1/4/71 |B_| Extension of Time request from General Motor Ford Motor and sler Corp
1/4/71 |] Qrde extending Lme 0 iling asnonse 0 hon ause Orde o—and
|I including Feb. 3, 1971 -—
1/6/71 |] Order adding S.D. N.Y. nos. 70 Civ 5385, 70 Civ S€97 & 70 Civ 5756 tS
| 1.. SCO _(B-1, 2 & 3)
1/27/71 | order adding W.D. Washingto ivil Action No. 4 0 0 =
1/2 1 [ HEARING ORDER sent to involved counsel and involved judge| | I Feb 26, 1971, Washington. D
1/27/71 0 OF HEARIN N 0 COUN
2-2-71 | CJ Letter motion from Dickstein, Shapiro & Galligan for extension |
| | of time for the 10 plaintiffs in S.D. N.Y. to file response to :
| Panels Order to Show Cause.
2-2-71 — Order extending time for filing response to Show Cause Order to andincluding Feb. 8, 1971 . Mailed to Counsel of Record aatkwinadies
2/3/71 |1.| Response of pl. Merit Motors, Inc.. ot al.
2/8/71 |2.| Response of defendant Ford Motor Company
2/8/71 Response of Chrysler (def.) opposing consolidation of Merit Motors Case
2/8/71 |4.| Response of Chrysler Corporation to SCO.
2 5. | Memorandum © Plainti in S S.D ew York Cases.
2/9/71 |6.| Brief of General Motor Ford and Chrysler
2/10/17: |7.| Memo of Plaintiffs City of Philadelphia, et ail
2/12 | 8, | Rep of Plainti Q_Defendan ' Response to Show. Cause Orde
2/22/71 |9.| Reply of Robert Ehrenbard on beha ® b = orp annexed to	|
BI brief on behalf of G.M ord and h S A eo ificate o oe ice
10.§ Ltr repl of plaintiff State of Washington ——City of Philadelphia, et a Vv eneral Motors, et 3 D. Pa
: aN Civ. A¢tiom No. 70-2753 - OPINION AND ORDER denving defendants’
|] Motion purgtiant to 28 .C. §1404(a) fo ansfer © he case
] to U.S.D.¥. for the E.D. of Michigan
6/21/71 |__| Consent ofrChief Judge Robson for assignment Of this litigation
[] to Judge Frank J. McGarr, N.D,.Ill for coordinated or consolidated
IR pretrial proceedings.
6/21/71 || OPINION and ORDER transferring litigation to the N.D. Iil for |CC] consolidated or coordinated pretrial proceedings and assigning
[1] to Judge McGarr.
6/23/71 | | STATE OF COLORADO V. GENERAL MOTORS CORD IT A DN 71 Civ. 1216
TT] NEter ad 0 today. en Oo counsel and involved judges.
7/1/71 ] QF MARYLAND M CORP A Md NO -398-K
] Q NTERED ODA an 0 ounse and invo ed Judge
Q ] QOLORADQ CG NERA MOTOR D N NO i A
| 0 N2A QDA AD » an ereo. § an “Noa exrk S.andae
7/12/71 J J COUNTY OF NASSAU, ST. OF N.Y. V DLN i 6.94
|__| MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ST. OF MD. V M D.N 9
| _ J ST. OF NEVADA V. G.M., S.D.N | Civ 66
| __J coMM. OF VA. V. G.M,., S.D.N.Y i 80
] CTO entered today. Sent to counsel and involved judge
7/19/71 |, ¥ST. OF MARYLAND . GENERAL MOTORS CORP. , MD, 71-398-¥
. | CTO fina od3 Notified ansferee ork Lransiero claxk
[ 1 NVQ ad Hirehere
|

rg SE	2 .
co -
52 PY :
® b- Cl
R23Date Q
7 || THE STATE OF TENNESSEE V. GENERAL MOTORS CORP., S.D.N.Y, 71 Civ. 2760
| 0 entered today. Sent to counsel, notified involved juddes.
7727/71 J STATE OF NEW YORK V. G.M., S.D.N.Y. 71 Civ. 3267 :
| §| STATE OF KANSAS V. G.M., ET AL., KANSAS, T-4999
] CTO entered today. Sent to counsel, notified involved judge
7/28/71 [|] COUNTY OF NASSAU, ST. OF N.Y. V, G.M., S.D.N.Y. 71 Civ. 1694 »
1] | MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ST. OF MD. V. G.M., S.D.N.Y. 71 Civ. 1953
| ST OF NEVADA V. G.M., S.D.N.Y. 71 Civ. 2366
|| CoM. OF KENTUCKY V. G.M., S.D.N.Y. 71 civ. 2425
|] CoM. OF VA. V. G.M. S.D.N.Y. 71 Civ. 1580
] CTOs final today. Notified transferee clerk, XK¥SEX¥EXAX INVOLVED
[ judges and transferor clerk
8-4-71 | ORDER- correcting OPINION AND ORDER of June 21, 1971 - Sent to 9hs all recipients of the 6/21/71 Opinion and Order
8-9-71 | STATE OF. TENN V. G.M. CORP., S.D.N.Y. 71 Civ. 2760
— CTO final today. Notified transteree clerk, transferor clerk, involved	judges. ~
8/12/71 | | STATE OF KANSAS V. GENERAL MOTORS CORP., D.KANSAS, T-4999
' § ST. OF NEW YORK V. GENERAL MOTORS, S.D.N.Y., 71 Civ. 3267
[ CTO final today. Sent to transferee clerk, involved judges.
10/22/71 1 | COMM. OF MASS V. GENERAL MOTORS CO., S5.D.N.V. iv. 4286
lL] CTO entered today. Sent to counsel and involved Judges:
9/71 | | COMM OF MASS V. GENERAL MOTORS CO., S.D.N.Y. 71 Civ. 4286
CC] CTO final today. Notified transferee clerk, transferor clerk
[ involved judges. -
5/19/72 1 | STATE OF OHIO V. GENERAL MOTORS CORP. ALT; S.D. OHIO; —T16
hr] ntered 0 toda Notified Transferor, Transferee judges. Notified
6/6/72 | I STATE	OF OHIO NERAL MOTORS CORP. A D. OHIO 72-160
[ Q_ fina Notified transferee judge, transferee clerk, involved judge	1772 | STATE OF WISCONSIN V. GENERAL MOTORS CORP., S.D.N.Y., No. 72 Civ. 2897
[ CTO entered today. Sent to counsel, notified involved judges
[|
ad |	YcoNeralglotorNCorp.	qnd Fold MofNr Comfyny def
7727772 | 0 NC NC UNC NC	NNN
[72.1 MAJOR SERVICE CO. V. FORD MOTOR CO., S.D.N.Y. 72 Civ. 2340
| 2ILBER TAXI SVC. V. G.M., S.D.FLA. 72-914
| AUTO DISCOUNT V. G.M., D.C., 1380-72
Motion of G.M. and Ferd for transfer to N.D.ILL pursuant to
| In 28 U.S.C. §1407. - p
8/8% 7/72])%	gy] AUTO DISCOUNT V. G. M., D.C. 1380-72 Plaintiff request for extension
| Mo file response to motion. ©
| ORDER ~- extending plaintiff to Sep.z#, 1972 time to file and serve
[ response Co
8/9 IST. OF WISCONSIN M D._N NO i 39
8 MAJOR R 0 ORD DN i 40
| J] ZILBER TAXI SVC. V. GM., S.D. Fla., No -=91
| AUTO DISCOUNT V. GM., D.C.,, No. 1380-
|] Def. Chrysler Corp. request for ext. to respond to motion to 9/8/7
]

Opinion and.Order of June 21, 1971,%3% F. supp. 2/4 .	no . c
Jee J; 1772 35 F Seon, Pe NOCKET NO. 5Spe CN »
DOCKET -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATIONNc
eT itigation Conngoe lee ID	BAS752
IN RE GOVERNMENT AUTO FLEET SALES ANTITRUST LITIGATION SA	7 ay
: R ANCA ly ¢ 6) & oy / 7 9.0. elecrpcw Spee otg < 7 Z EA Za VY 2
em [alee l a	NO. D.C. NUMBER} JUDGE NX.	\
A-1 |Merit Motors, Inc.,-et al. Vv. Chrysler oT ee \ oT NN.__lecrporation, et al. Tre ~~. 12000-70 ° pratt VV id
i A-2 [City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania v. E.D. Pa. ee yn, Nooo
C General Motors Corporation, et al. 70-2753 Davis fe/~f He,
A-3 e C1 hy, of Newyork, New Yor et ali»y. S. DN.Y.Auspmobi be Manuf turers Assoc.	,. Inc., ™~J70 Civ™{535(*) et ay. Se ho RA FRM SH, H, {i 3/31/76 ~z/ 03)	I :
A-4 |The State of Oklahoma v. General Motors s.D. N.Y. oiler alr 7Corporation, et al. eT 70 Civ 4246 Ys +
A-5 |The State of Texas v. General Motors s.D. N.Y. | Lf Ya ln/>
Corporation, et al. rT 70. Civ 4247 # —1 v7	7. fe
A-6 |The state of Arizona v. General Motors |S.D. N.Y 4121/7 S/O.Corporation, et al. ’ 76 civ 4248 - ~~Sb #
A-7 |the state of Florida v. General Motors |S.D. N.Y. Gold ee 4Corporation, et al. pciv—4249T TT 7 7
A-8 |The State of Iowa v. General Motors. ...—-— EnSB a me”bis Pa: /3/62
Corporation, et al. 70 civ 4250 77D
A-9 |The State of Vermont v. General Motors Ss.D. N.Y. oo as; |Z 2% VsCorporation; et al. 70° Civ 4251 4/51/2/ Zz Je 7)
A-3a|The City of New York, et al. V. General |S.D. N.Y. fmm fa ES 55 7¢ Motors, et al. 70 Civ 4245 5 A425, = 057» LF. / ” A ¢
5-1 | The state of Louisiana v. General Motors|S.D. N.Y. YY. 4S 134555Corporation, et al. - 70- Civ 53873" . J Lads
B-2 The State of Alabama V. General Motors SD NY foe RE DW. : 7 SLCorporation, et al. 70 Civ 549%
B-3 The State of Missouri v. General Motors S.D. N.Y ltoor T7Z J2// . Za25
Corporation, et al. 70 civ 5754. 47 1 327Z —
@... State of Washington v. General.Motors. 1 W.D. Wash. V2 41/7 2% SHYCorporation, et al. 4233 rl “55

a DOCKET NO. _.&5
DOCKET -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION f 2
@ Description of Litigation _
IN RE GOVERNMENT AUTO FLEET SALES ANTITRUST LITIGATION (TAG-ALONG CASES)
DISTRICT & TRANSFER
NO. CAPTION D.C., NUMBER] JUDGE DATE ISC.
p-1 State of Connect [dh 2% YA BT (11. — 1
Motors..Corp.y	egake 2 } T7T1C 830 Perry XY%& = .
Pr ~ > 52h Le A YE Ie DE i Ra =>
D-2 The State of Colorado v. General Motors,} S.D.N _— yr er ~~ Hs: 7
® " Corp., et al. é/23/7/ 71 Civ. 1216 & —p J V7DB3 The State of Maryland v, General Motors| Maryland| = / by7-4f [A
Corp., et al. 7 /7/ "71-398-K | Kaufma aH9/94 = /[3.2 )J
D-4 County of Nassau, State of New York "Is.D. MN.:¥Y. bY “od evev. General Motors Corp. et “al. 2a] 2t 71.Civ. 1694Bryan.. 2/8 I: & 519%)
D-5 Montgomery County, State of Maryland S.D.N.Y. 1 " -) 14v. General Motors. Corp., et ath 71 Civ. 1953Bryan 7) 8 PRIZE
D-6 State of Nevada v. General Motors S.D.N.Y.	_}1 4 T5y-if- 185,Corp., et al. yal To 17T Civ. 2364 7 748 ree 982475 “ 2
D-7 Commonwealth of Kentucky v. General S.D.N.Y, bm 7h 17, = 71-1955Motors Corp., et al. 2/2) cm N71 Civ. 24275 7/25 / 4 /e/7)~. i v/ _.
D-8 The Commonwealth of Virginia v, General |S.D< N.Y, 77 otf 74 15577- Motors Corp., et al. 2A) 71 Civ. 158(Bryan 17 73
D-9 The State of Tennessee v. Gengral = S.D.N.Y. I _¢/e/n = 18Motors Corp., et al. 7 3 2 71 Civ. 2760 AEE
~ —,
-10 The State of Kansas y. General Motors {RKansas—— ~g/af7 7305,Corp. et al. 2/52/0) T-4999 Templa
D-11 State of New York v, General Motors _ |sS.D.N.v....Y} RY) sl TRISCorp., et al. 7/27/7) 71 Civ. 326 HC 7)
XYZ-1 | State of Michigan v. General Motors _IN.D. T11 {+__{ ~~ 7 Co,
Corp. , et al. - 71C2215 p oe 7
XYz-2 | State of West Virginia v. General Motors |N.D. Ill CIS
Corp., et al. 71C2210 I Se77
@::-: Mayor and Cty Council of Balto. v. Genera N.D.ILL } SenMotors Corp., et al. TIC 2469 a es	~,
D-12 Commonwealth of Mass. v. General Motors| S/D. N.Y. } a 7/7 ~ 1273]	| Corp., et al. /G/7a/7/ 71 civ. 4246 0/9 72717, r</7
"i = £ A r LA ’ to Z3 70 7 om ’ / if | i na I

— [c= 20H
oN to 7 tH tk 7 i ! T £ nl	td * ee 1 ig) on ul [1-8 « no + gmajo} 0 > , © . 7 / paw	o | VA l =~	ss
— TT : H	—_— HR == wn > = N 5 4aa < gro KH = © Ho ap RYZE CE RE 23 = 0S00: I FO EA LA EN5 2 3 oc Ot 3 RY 0 ce =" g2 ooNO) Bo Ne RO UI) Ro 3 uU + ow Ho ne~ 0 0 Ze 0 AY oo n H- = to 0 “a	Too 0] al vi ~ 0 UY — t ~ 0 os oR a)
®<~ O Q +h i) Fh Hoot 0) Q =a Rd So |] 5 aE o 0 = cl HO ol B00 29© 0 of hz +2 = 00 “Aung aa KR Fh ns
LA © 3 5B ov & 95 army as w oo T 4 Tel. : ol= - 0 : : ~ 5	DE AA = 0 R 9 ~ OQ ~~ p Joboo 0” Ih I “2 Nem p 6 0 8 00 ITREN po 0 7 QB o 0 A @ a 5 Sis	o WH < x oo R Noe { oH on 0 ona 0 0 Ny Ro TH N RZ = =p -0 LI = a,24 v0 Hh She — e Q « © @Vo EE ENCE SIN 3 Ca iNE W Sl bee: tek gd Toe 5sREE \VEEE] BASNE SPA F SIV SE5% We 5 ge tps O° SES ENN ga ON 2 E : 0 o NA do &a 5 2 0 + < boo | t=	ag Nhe EE LF it 3. ® : rs : 2)	jo = xX i) x 0]EE I BE I aeHE = gb | : P NN ¢ oO P | O otSO FoWE=	Jeo =A o NEA 0 h- 3 ih BlOl AR$a oO ou . a HEE : \ F = 5 18 2B.gs oo H p= &! i" RSSU 0 = pt Ig - NE = a 0 ct* : } = ~ IN =
EEE BEET ix 2 A A YEzal a<a x= LE ¢2 To CO i He ol ht e £ NE zLEE ES AY 4 I 2505 &Lo Lion Ig] IN H- |< CN i | 5S b== o) La i 5 : : No bo H =z	! H ; * Ww | ! w £0 fon!] ; hd = I 0 ti| ] { Ld 19 ; | S = i OoQ os TN T “XK | 5 ~i he AY KN Nn lof; | ! A ™ | NN [9 5	{ : ! (N | i NS ai + 0| = N 4 ANN NN " HO| ; N I~ INS | | \ | n
SHEEN {: NL RE	Ay o
— 4 ~N ING NEE | 18H= = IN HW AJ ECAwoo fw p 0 NOR jee(§} ¢ : \ GQ To3 9 AN x AY | Zz«3 YZ J i Le 0
SEA FEV £ SI 8 SLE -SSy; \ ~~ (SV i Tw)H Wy | ld : nw iYNEE 8 NO NNN 520 2DN N Ne NG > NC No ~N n : 3 0 1~ EA DY N. NL 4) AN OO NU oo 1» om oN N ) ’ : X \ \i Po EEEON Ni I ON RR \™ J yg VT woN NN Nd NJ ~U TN ANee NY YN~~ EE ERNN \ ) [5 H- xl NL .	XX RN : 5 SN. \PE™ 3 5 5 Nu XW a
RN ENRNy \q ~ IN) IN N NY	N 3 ~ NJ g

;
’ NS | ~	~ oo R
IS NN NER EA x Jp nN No NE 3 NL510 wd NER eeowm aN SRN ~N\ ~N Ny [Na . 5 ~WE N\. nN R 7: NNAN| Q J ¥ aN AS _— 2 IN i SN TW \“~20Nit	SO EI AN <Q — EAE A oN |NEE N 7, MEE | NEno A A oJ ) NG ) wy ! i : : HQU. I % 7 or| ) ~ J / i ———	Sell2 hed y o/| V i ! “i etIn! J Ji ¥ Jt N A : NR2a] < No) SNE\ | AN :59 L Rl 2 EERE IN RN BEEN	SENS n NRA | NRE N ! SNAN RN i Na x> NY ~N RAS NN ! | a Wo]NI NN NG J LR NN : ol NOl vo aN ~~ 3 Na : ! i N25 N 3 \ 37 SN | f Y ..7 aN 2 > 2 rN ; =~ | CONGEY 8 III I 2 3 LNa i 500! > © iy vo= H| y ©! al 0 v7 0 Wo I~ ~ SNREE) 2 TC SEE vB= HER } Ug <| i CwZz ERIS : & Q! ~ hi - x x	OQ . Us : i | H . — ~ a $S |[0%E oS INT of RE ANE|on ™ 3 ’| = ul =E a a} (~ w! i N BY NE BR	Lal 1 | n © 5 ° AN 2 2 —Me ol om YN Go a NN ;	ETRE Zz . =I \	“Tg . . ny na UE un	RT E-=	i] a . =
S |lo Pla nw A metsA ! o — IN) ERN Se rE NE:2 “ FINED LN gf	=] 0+ Jd *wn IY a 7, © a2 oy — 0 HO co 0 iS) 08) — «ANY N ecN\ ‘SN OD yo No + . HH fol	2 VIP rN ON J 8. Zoa SERRE ENE) £50ry ©] . 0} a 2 Nn Qo oeNERY <Q NW . > « MY ~ + +H 5 .NEN Bet 0 oN ~~ ©8 qN 8 0 . © 84 48 No >NONes $s 7 ~% 3 § Jo HalE&Y wDRE EE 10 gp Op BNE aETwo 8 HH a0 5% 0 4 WES 38°
IR 28 5H CE a” B92 G3 < HHal3 ved pnlh So ay 08 wd 0— ha Ea woCle TiO = ag 48 “wo 48 9+ © G5 0Sdn, 55 9 S 9, 8 58 BE “goo“one Eo 8 WE won Tg Pe wg g Lo
Slug Sa °8 3 So 5 0d AB SB ——	po LON= EH <n 00 OE +P (VR) al 5 a2 ——SMT< og eo oH s g> © TT+ — © O +© © Q < wn 0
0 OoM Coe A -02 mo = on 0 STTT © N =v so.	— © = — 7 5 e!	~ ul — [ ! 73] @I ON ~ 4) — 7 1 <5 J	Vl TE BE il 0 i	BOE ! i i	SH 3m f
HO =z :

p. 1
ATTORNEY SERVICE LIST
JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
C DOCKET NO. 65 == IN RE GOVERNMENT AUTO FLEET SALES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
eee ee tte eee cmt
Plaintiff Defendant
MERIT MOTORS, INC/, ET AL. CHRYSLER CORPORATION
Jerry S. Cokep, Esquire CHRYSLER MOTORS CORP.
1776 K Str N. W. : CHRYSLER LEASING CORP.
o Washingtgd, D.C. 20006 CHRYSLER FINANCIAL CORP.	Willd O. Bittman, Esquire :
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA _ Hogan & rtson
David Be , Esq. ! 815 Comfediicut Ave, N.W.
“1622 LocuXt Street Washington, ®. C. 20006
= Philadel¥phda, Penna. ; and )07 Robe Ehrepbard, Esquire
~~ No Co elley\Dyfe, Warren, Clark, Carr & Elli
THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF MARYLAND B50 Park )XAvenue
THE STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF NEVADA New Yo ' w York 10022
THE STATE OF ARIZONA, COMM. OF VERS INIA	THE STATE OF FLORIDA ,/7£WAESSE. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
THE STATE OF IOWA /gzeiseodsSsd) | williax Pie¥, Jr., Esquire
THE STATE OF VERMONT Sulliva Cromwell
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL. 48 Wall eet
THE STATE OF LOUISIANA ~ New York, York 10005
THE STATE OF ALABAMA /ST. OF COLORADO . :
THE STATE OF MISSOURI GENERAL MOTORS CROP.
David I. Shapiro, Esquire Paul, Weiss, Goldberg, Rifkind, Wharton
Dickstein apiro & Galligan & Garryson
800 Federay¥ Bar Building West 345 Park Xvenue
1819 H StXegt, N. W. New York, New York 10022;
Washingt6n, + C. 20006
® THE STATE OX WASHINGTON GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATIONNicholas B Connell, Jr., Esquire ¢ 1armond Chaffetz, EsquireSpecial AssXstant Attornéy General Fred Bartlit, Esquire
700 112th/Avdpue, N. E. Krikland, Elkis, etc.
Bellevue, Washington 98004 27th Floor, Prudential PlazaChicago, Illinois 60601
THE COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
John B. Breckinridge CHRYSLTER CORPOATION
Attorney General : Ed Wendrow, Esquire
: State Capitol Building d NT Strawn, Smith, etc.Frankfort, Kentucky 40601 Suite 5000, One First Nat'l Plaza
| Chicago, Illinois 60670
| C Lea. A. Freeman, Esq. EFreeman, Freeman & Salzman FORD MOROR COMPANY .
Al Suite 3200, One IBM Plaza : [Rt P. Burnhan, psduire3 1 1 ; ’
- Chicago, Illinois 60602 : 231 South LaSalle Street :
| Chicago, 111. 60604

co DOCKET NO. 65
ATTORNEY LIST -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
DESCRIPTION OF LITIGATION y
IN RE BUOVERNMENT AUTO FLEET SALES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
No. Plaintiff Defendant
A-1 J Jerry S. Cohen, Esquire BA Hogan & Hartson
1776 XK Street, N. W. ~~ 815 Connecticut Avenue, N. W.
Qo Washington, D. C. 20006 Washington, D. C. 20006ALL DEFENDANTS
A-2 David Berger, Esq. —- FORD MOTOR COMPANY
1622 Locust St. Henry Kolowrat, Esquire
' Philadelphia, Penna.19103 H. Francis DeLone, Esquire‘ 1600 Three Penn Center Plaza
; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Fy 8 _
So N, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
: EE Robert W. Sayre, Esquire
23rd Floor, Packard Building
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
2x3 2rDavid I. Shapiro, Esquire GENERAL MOTORS
A-3 Dirksatein, Shapiro & Galligan = Paul, Weiss, Goldberg, Rifkind,800 Federal Bar Bldg. West — Wharton & Garrison
} 1819 H Street, N. W. 345 Park Avenue
Washington, D. C. 20006 New York, New York 10022
Co AUTOMOBI®E_MANUFACTU ASSOCIATION, INC
Mr. Willis Crabgree ALegal Departmes °
Automobile nutagtoep PIKES tion,o B Inc . Se- 320 New Center Building
Detroit, Michigan 48202
FORD MOTOR COMPANY (see )
Wright Tisdale, Esquire (below)
Vice President & General Counsel
Ford Motor Company
The American Road
Dearborn, Michigan 48121
CHRYSLER CORPORATION (see )
o Paul A. Heinen, Esquire (below)	Associate General Counsel
I Chrysler Corporation
- 321 Massachusetts Avenue
Detroit, Michigan 48231
OVER

No. Plaintiff Defendant
a-3 | AMERICAN MSTORS Cf Por
cont Walter J. Will anes No]House Counsel & A £ ecretafll)
American Moors Cerpo “fe14250 Plymbuth Road	“. 4Detroit, Michigan 48232=
A-4
A-5 SAME AS A 3 ABOVE SAME AS A-3 ABOVE
A-6 -
A-7 ~ FORD MOTOR COMPANY, P - =	_ 3 AM
2s _ ® Sullivan & cldlban, rel, IR, £39.= 48 Wall Street
New York, New York 10005 C
CHRYSLER £QR TON ped, E30.~ Kell DEED Ena iaed, Eso. Maginnes—_—r & Warren
==, 350 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10022
B-1 Same as A-3 above (Shapiro) N _
B-2 d :
B-3
c-1 Nicholas B. O'Connell, Jr. AMERICAN MOTORS CORPORATION
Special Asst. Attorney General : Walter J. Williams, Esquire
Y 700 112th Ave., N. E. : House Counsel & Asst. Secretary
1 .Bellevue, Washington 98004 American Motors Corporation
14250 Plymouth Road
D-1 | Perry Goldberg Detroit, Michigan 48232
Suite 1130
208 Ss. LaSalle st.
Chicago, Ill.
D-2 Same as A-3 (Shapiro) o
D-4 Same as A-3 (Shapiro)
D-5 Same as A-3 (Shapiro) |
D-6 ‘Same as A-3 (Shapiro)
D7 ‘Wesley A. Weathers A900 Merchants National Bank Building
Topeka, Kansas 66612 ‘
D-8 “SameasA-3(Shapiro) | C

* p. . N
Plaintiff Defendant
D-1 Perry Goaklrg, Esq.	Suite 1130
208 S. ZaLasaile St. CChicago, Illinois 60604
Norris Ly O'Neill
. 99 Pratt .
Hartfordy Connecticut 06103 ‘
D-2 Shapiro (same as /a-3)
D-3 WilliaM L. Marbuy, Esquire | FORD MOWOR COMPANY
Paul V.\Njémeyer John HeERry Lewin, Esquire
' Piloer	anX Marbury = oo Venable aetjer & Howard C	900 FipSt\National Bank Building : 1700 rcaytide Bank & Trust Bldg.
Baltimore, Maryland 21202 Baltimore, . 21201
D-44;D-5, D-6 (Shapiro, same as A-3) CHRYSLER CORP
\ RogeM A. Clapp, Esquire
D-7 Breckinridge, John B. i 1d. AttorneyGeneral Clapp. rville, Black & Honemann
State gapitol Building a 1900 Firs National Bank Buildng
Frankfort, Kentucky 40601 Baltimopé Maryland 21202
D-8 Same as A-3 (Shapiro)
D-9 Same as A-3 (Shapiro)
D-10 Vern iller
Attorn General
State pitol Building
TopeKa, Kansas 66612
D-11 Louis-Lefkowitz
Attorn General
80 Cent Street
New York, New York 10013
D-12 (Same as A-3) Shapiro
Honorable Robert H. Quinn
Attorne eneral
State se
Bostory, Massachusetts 02133
E-1 Alan Witten ~ :
Assistan torneys General yf
State of AMpio AUR ‘
83 S. Four St Cu \V CColumb@is, Olio 43215 iy 3
E-2 Same as above (Shapiro)

p. 1
ATTORNEY SERVICE LIST
JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
® DOCKET NO. 65 =-- IN RE GOVERNMENT AUTO FLEET SALES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
er re teeta ete emer eet eee me
Plaintiff Defendant
MERIT MOTORS, INC/, ET AL. CHRYSLER CORPORATION
Jerry S. Cokep, Esquire CHRYSLER MOTORS CORP.
1776 K Str N. W. Co CHRYSLER LEASING CORP.
o Washingtgd, D.C. 20006 CHRYSLER FINANCIAL CORP.	Willf O. Bjttman, Esquire
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA _ Hogan & rtson
David Bekg , Esq. s ! 815 Comrfed{icut Ave, N.W.
. 1622 LocuXt Street ‘ Washington, . C. 20006
PhiladelphMa, Penna. ; and .
107 Robe Ehrepbard, Esquire
~~ \ elley\Dyfe, Warren, Clark, Carr & Ellis
THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA , STATE OF MARYLAND B50 Park)XAvenue
THE STATE OF TEXAS , STATE OF NEVADA New York, w York 10022
THE STATE OF ARIZONA , COMM. OF VERS INIA	THE STATE OF FLORIDA ,/7AWAVESSE. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
THE STATE OF IOWA J 2e/KSCoUSs2) | willidx Pie¥, Jr., Esquire
THE STATE OF VERMONT Sulliva Cromwell
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL, 48 wall eet
THE STATE OF LOUISIANA "New York, York 10005
THE STATE OF ALABAMA /ST. OF COLORADO
THE STATE OF MISSOURI GENERAL MOTORS CROP.
David I.\ Shapiro, Esquire Paul, Weiss, Goldberg, Rifkind, Wharton
Dickstein apiro & Galligan & Garr soga
800 Federay¥ Bar Building West 345 Park Xvenue
1819 H St¥feet, N. W. New York, New York 10022;
Washingt0n, . C. 20006
o THE STATE OX WASHINGTON GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATIONNicholas B Connell, Jr., Esquire ¢ amnond Chaffetz, EsquireSpecial AssXstant Attornéy General Fred Bartlit, Esquire
700 112th/Avdnue, N. E. Krikland, Ellis, etc.
Bellevue, Washington 98004 27th Floor, Prudential PlazaChicago, Illinois 60601
THE COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
John B. Breckinridge CHRYSLTER CORPOATION
Attorney General Ed Wendrow, Esquire
. State Capitol Building g 4 ioston: Strawn, Smith, etc.	Frankfort, Kentucky 40601 Suite 5000, One First Nat'l Plaza
Chicago, Illinois 60670
C Lea. A. Freeman, Esq. : :| ~ Freeman, Freeman & Salzman ~ | EORD MOROR COMPANY .
| yk Suite 3200, One IBM Plaza [it P. Burnhat, Dsduire| x Co. ,
~ Chicago, Illinois 60602 231 South LaSalle Street
| Chicago, 111. 60604

ATTORNEY LIST ~-- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
o DESCRIPTION OF LITIGATION
DOCKET NO. 65 —-- IN RE GOVERNMENT AUTO FLEET SALES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
No. . Plaintiff Defendant -
E-3] Robert Ky an, Esquire
Kaplan, Kilsheimer & Foley
o 122 Ea%t 42hd StreetNew York, New York 10017
E-4] Seymour Xurland, Esq.
Wolf, Blogk, 8Chorr and Solis Cohen
12th Floory Packard Building AAPhiladelphiy, Penna.
E-5f Joseph B.\Gildenhorn, Esq.
Brown, Gil¥&nhorn & Statland-
1101 17th/'Street, N.W. 7
Washington, C. 20036
E-6 | Shapairo (Same as A-1)
E-7} Shapiro(Dickstein, Shapiro &
Gallagan)
E-8 Warrem\ B. dman, Esq.
C Attorne eneral of New HampshireOffice the Attorney General
State” Hou Annex
Concord, NeW Hampshire 03301
/ . %
E-9 | RELENO 32 Ke srtey dog	Attorney Ne€neral y h
P.O. Bg 6%9 Zphy
Ralejdh, Noth Carolina 27602
E-10] Goodmin, Eden, Millender, Goodman
& Bddrgsian
! 3200 Cgdillac Tower
{ Detr ; Michigan

vo. plantaer	| __ Defendant
E-1¥ Elias Abekofi, Esquire . - .
Deputy Atyorney General .
State of/NewJersey oStates House Annex
Trentof, New Jersey 08625
E-131 ~Thomas\H. cker
Chief Ccyuwsel for Board of Regents
Universi¥y of Oklahoma
660 ParyiRgton Oval
Norman, Oklahoma 73069
E~-1 Franciscd De Jesus Shuck, Esq.
Attorney Eeperal oOffice of Monopolistic Affairs
102 San cisco St.
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00902
E-14 Morris L. Weisberg; Esquire
Blank, XR aus & Comisky
| 4 P en Plaza
PHiladelphia, nna. 19103
E-15 Peter K. ack, Esquire
DeputyAttorgrey General
| State of Iifornia
600 Sta Building
Los Angeles, California
E-16 Same as abdge( Shapiro)
E-17 Larry MW Woods, Esq.
Sapp, Woo nnov & Orr
4 tar Bhlding
Columbia, MissoUtes 65201 ®
E-18 Stephen L. Dunne, Esquire
Chief Counsel, Antitrust Diviaion
102 State Office Building
Salem, Oregon 97310
E-19 Allen I. Olson, Attorney General
S State of North Dakota
North Dakota State Capitol Bldg. .
Bismarck, North Dakota 58501

Pp.
JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
DOCKET NO. 65 - IN RE GOVERNMENT AUTO FLEET SALES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
C COMMON PARTY CHECKLIST
NAME OF PARTY | NAMED AS PARTY IN FOLLOWING ACTIONS
‘Ww El aN i & 189 Bai. 23 1) 2D DC
~ WEB ry	rrehrysler GorporatioN[ Fo SHIH FFA =
—_—
¥rysler Motdrs Corp. [-	—————————_—————————————
| rr
® NP]
Chrysler Leasing Corp 72 + ~—+H Ff	————————
\J ——
“ er
drysler Financia [7	————
Corn —_—	|
_—
“0 CEE. YB AV. OO 2 WSs EW 7% A
neral Motors Corp. [At YP tA tp PR fyEE
ES	Sh A SC |
\p—m—————————————————
—	|
webord Motor = WEE) BAT a Es di 4 5 aS ==, GA—
By .
resiobile Manufac- [oo]
a
x Bs
Anerican Motors Corp. —
o Eee