1:68-F-00009•IN RE: Protection Devices and Equipment and Central Station Protection Service Antitrust Cases
IN RE: Protection Devices and Equipment and Central Station Protection Service Antitrust Cases
1:68-F-00009JpmlApr 27, 2015
Full text
PROTECTION DEVICES AND EQUIPMENT AND g CENTRAL STATION PROTECTION SERVICE ASPATRHSEREASES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Jury demand date: _ D.C.FormNo.16ARev. 8 9 TITLE OF CASE ATTORNEYSFor plaintiff: C SPECIAL NOTE: Pamel Opinion of October 3, 1968 cited at 295 F.Supp. 39(1968) Panel Opinion of November 14, 1968 cited at 297 F. Supp. 622 (1968) For defendant: i I I Ea J.S. 5 mailed Clerk J.S. 6 mailed Marshal Basis of Action: Docket fee @ Witness fees Action arose at: Depositions
DATE | PROCEEDINGS TedgmentNoted¢7/17/68 Order to Show Cause signed by Judge Murrah sent to all parties
by Clerk.
8/2/68 Response to Order to Show Cause filed on behalf of Pizitz, Inc. etal.
8/5/68 Response on behalf of Chicago's plaintiffs why actions shoulw
| not be transferred.
|
8/7/68 Opposition filed on behalf of Smith Detectice Agency, McCane-
Sandock, Federal Engineering Call's Police Signal Corp,
Merchan's Police Alarm Corp., Michigan Burglar Alarm
Systems, Automatic Alarm Corp. & Pacific Fire Extinguisher Co. ®
8/9/68 Memorandum in Opposition to transfer filed on behalf of plaintiffs,
Rhodes Western.
8/8/68 Memorandum filed in response to Order to Show Cause filed on
behalf of Robinson Protective Alarm Corp.
10/3/68 Order from Judge Sugarman consenting to transfer multidistrict litigation to
Southern District of New York.
10/3/68 Memorandum and Order transferring Civil Actions under Section 1407, Title 28,
{ 1 1 - AP hoi
United States Code to the Southern District of New York (except tag-along cas X78" }
10/9/68 Show Cause Order signed by Judge biurrah (dated 10/9/68) for additional cases
(tag-along) listed in Schedule B.
10/14/68 | Response of Plaintiffs in Civil Action Nos. 68C 1662, 68C 1663 and 68C 1667
to show cause order (tag—-along)
10/15/68 | Response of plaintiff (Electro-Protective Corp., et al., Civ. 763-68 (N.J.) to
show cause order (tag-along).
10/25/68 | Filed order making correction in Schedule 4 issued on Oct. 3 as follows:
2. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Orinnell Corp., et al. S.D.N.Y. ® 67 Civ. 2249
11/14/68 | Filed order of Judicial Panel transferring tag-along cases to the
Southern District of New York5
DOCKET -- JUDICIAL PANEL ONMULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION AN
LC) DESCRIPTION OF LITIGATION
DOCKET NO. 9 - PROTECTION BEVICES AND EQUIPMENT AND CENTRAL STATIQN PROTECTION
SERVICE ANTITRUST CASES X RA .
od fie
D
Date #4 District : =
No. Caption , Court Judge D.C. No.
; YRANEFEK
A-1] United States vo AEs] Corp., st al. IAN Y., S. {65 Civ.2486
® AL ESATA a // , 2 A-2 | Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. a
Grinnell Corp., et al. — NL . Ur gre 2249
A-3} R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. Vv. Grinnell}§ EU / |Corp., et al. I oo " 7 oe) IS 67Civ. 2258
A-4) City Stores Co., et al. v. Grinnell. |
Corp., et al. IE RA D " ‘§67Civ. 2259
A-5| Russ Togs, Inc., et al. v: Grinnell IN Corp., et al. REE n 167Cciv. 2594
A-6] Interstate Department Stores, Inc., 1 . J :
et al. v. Grinnell Corp., et al. “FN TTT ¥ /56 Ne 7Civ. 25985
A-71 Swank, Inc. v. Grinnell Corp., et al. }] > .- } oo" . 67Civ. 25986
A-8] Associated Dry Goods Corp., et al. v. Co : os 5]Grinnell Corp., et al. W | n pe DY 25/4 k67Civ. 2606
A-9 | Gimbel Brothers, Inc., et al. v. NN
Grinnell Corp., et al. ~~ = RN " 167 Civ.261Q
@ The May Department Stores Co. Vv. 1 | Grinnell Corp., et al. 1 oo" 67Civ. 2612
A-11} Zale Corp., et al. v. Grinnell Corp., |
et al. EEE SU UE 67Civ. 2619
A-12] Allied Stores Corp., et al. v. 3
Grinnell Corp., et al. EE BE § " $667Civ. 2618
A-13 | Berkey Photo, Inc., et al. v. Grinneld | & —— —— Yi os
Corp., et al. | | " © Tove civ. 262
@ Spartans Industries, Inc., et al. v. LFGrinnell Corp., et al. it Ace — 55/2575 ¥civ. 2622
A-154 Howard Harlem, Inc., et al. v. Grinnell _ i
Corp., et al. CE: FS RA, EE H7Civ. 2940
A-16 § W. T. Grant Co. v. Grinnell Corp., et fl. " p7 Civ.3820DOCKET -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
C DESCRIPTION OF LITIGATION
DOCKET NO. 9 - PROTECTION DEVIDES AND EQUIPMENT AND CENERAL STATION PROTECTION
SERVICE ANTITRUST CASES
Date of District B
No. Caption Sinininols Court Judge D.C. No,
} [20 Ale ~ 7 i
A-17} Lerner Stores Corp., et al, v. Grinne}l
C Corp., et al. wt .§s.p., N.v. 67Civ.4433
A-18J McCrory Corp. v. Grinnell Corp., et aj. " 67Civ.4720
A-19} S. Klein Dept. Stores, Inc. v. Cw |
Grinnell Corp., et al. Ne o " l67Civ. 478%
A-20§ Federal's Inc. v. Grinnell Corp., et LV BSL 5/>5/5 ME68Civ.573
A-21] Arlan's Dept. Stores, Inc., et al. v. R N Grinnell Corp., et al. SS SE J). / _M68Civ.574
Bey 45/2/05 |
A-22} Cunningham Drug Stores, Inc., et al. | : oo
Vv. Grinnell Corp., et al. 1. S81 X-// 7 NE68Civ.659
A-23] Zayre Corp., et al. v. Grinnell Corp.} Ph.N . /| et al. BE Sa SE. SY/.27) o$~f68Civ. 2361
A-241 Smith Detective Agency & Nightwatch i
Service, Inc. v. Ameri an District]
Telegraph Co., et al./l: gE YY 7/" 67Civ.2240
~
A-25] McCane-Sondock Protection Systems, Ing.
v. American D¥strigt Tel®grap . Me :
® et al. c Zee X/ 67Civ.2241
A-26{ Federal Engineering Co., Inc. v. Amga Jcan
District Telegraph Co., et al ZaArZd«4i a 3/4 v4 67Civ.2242
A-27] Call's Police Signal Corp. v. Amepfca gs _ || District Telgraph Co., et algZlrHc2gzes 255] 67Civ.2243
A-28} Merchants Police Alarm Corp. v. Ame do]District Telegraph Co., et al . JOPPA Atos 3/4 v/ 167Civ. 2244
A-29] Michigan Burglar Alarm Systems, Inc.,|
o et al. v. Ameri istrict Peleggray ’Co., et al. : < ¥/ : §67Civ. 2245
A-30}] Automatic Alarm Corp. V. Americgy i
District Telegraph Co., et 4#¢<Z X7 ne 7 67Civ.2246A-31 J] The Grand Union Company Vv. Grinnell
- Corp., et al. Ce ee " p8Civ.2509DOCKET -- JUDICIAL PANEL ONMULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION C DESCRIPTION OF LITIGATION DOCKET NO. 9 - PROTECTION DEVICES AND EQUIPMENT AND CENTRAL STATION PROTECTION SERVICE ANTITRUST CASES Date ®f District ] - No. Caption Tainbamh Court Judge D.C. No. , IWSEEE - - A-32 | Hutzler Bros. Co. v. Grinnell Corp., qt al. s.0., wv. bop) fo 8 68Civ. 2669 ®.... J. C. Penney Co. v. Grinnell Corp., eff alf | " . j68Civ.2670 A-34 Cartier, Inc. v. Grinnell Corp., et aj. : " E68Civ.2671 A-35] Robert Hall Clothes, Inc., et al. v. | CL Grinnell Corp., et al. ~ I EEX ooo" 1 168Civ. 2722 A-36} Su Crest Corp., et al. v. Grinnell i Corp., et al. a " §68Civ.2723 A-37} Snyder Drug Stores, Inc. v. Grinnell | | Corp., et al. we : Loo" 68Civ.2741 A-38] Aldens, Inc. v. Grinnell Corp... et all. " §168Civ.2742 A-39] Gamble-Skogmo, Inc. v. Grinnell Corp. et al. EE | EE 68Civ.2743 A-40] Shoppers World Midway Corp., gt al. Vv 2 Grinnell Corp., et al. Fir didgek Nilay . \ l68civ.2744~~ A-41] The State of New Ygrk v. Grinnell QO) Corp., et al.cZ ~ cg BW % ! " : 168Civ.2765 © \ ) 0... The Port of New York Authority v.. 1 \)Grinnell Corp., et al. Cor a " 68Civ.2766 A-43] Supermarkets General Corp., et al. v.} | Grinnell Corp., et al. . "oo 68Civ.2774 A-44| Hart Schaffner & Marx, et al. v. 1 Grinnell Corp., et al. ww Com §68Civ. 2771 A-45] American 2h 09 AUS tL) ef «FNXfnd _— op. dt Z] \ et a (AL €finnell Corp., &P%a 2 Yosk7/ ==== [68Civ.2776 @.. Shoe Corporation of America v. Grinnell ‘Corp., et al. CE tt" 68Civ.2793 A-47] Rapid American Corp. Vv. Grinnell Corpg, | et al. SE WV| RE a 68Civ.2794 A-48% The B. V. D. Co., Inc., et al. v._ : Grinnell Corp., et al. EE Me 68Civ.2795
DOCKET -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION :
C DESCRIPTION OF LITIGATION
DOCKET NO. 9 - PROTECTION DEVICES AND EQUIPMENT AND CENTRAL STATION PROTECTION
SERVICE ANTITRUST CASES
Dates District ; =
No. Caption ed Court Judge D.C. No.
A-49 | The Certified Alarm & Signa} Co. Vv. so
® Grinnell Corp., et al.&C& a4 2 IS.D., N.Y. 68Civ.2556A-50] Gerson Zimmerman d/b/a Ace of Spades :
Burglar Alarm Co. Vv. Grinnell Corp :
et al. : g " 168Civ.2557
A-51] Protection Alarms, Cc. V. Grinnell : :
Corp., et al. ’ " : 68Civ.2558
H .
| \
| A-52] Bay Alarm Co. V FEEL wu SEA " j68Civ.2559
A-53] Apex Signal Service Diyision of Apex
| Genie, Inc. v. riding Coxrp., &t 4 PQ " 68Civ.2560A-54] Peter J. Newmann d/b/a/ albany Protec q :
Service v. GrinnellyCarp. et al. 4 A " 68Civ.2561
A-55] Thomas DelLarue, Inc. v. Automatic Fire NS
Alarm Co. of Dejpyarpy phd we 4 AL, 23 | j68Civ. 2647
A-56}) Pacific Fire Exteinguisher Co. yg’ 4 AS 4_7Z = 399 :American District Telegraph#Co., €% a " j68civ. 2746
A-57] Owl Protective Co., Inc, (N.Y.) v. )
® Grinnell Corp HERE ne p ” lesciv. 2779A-58] Owl Protective Co., Inc. (Pa v. 0)Grinnell Corp., et al, gC ZONE | 68Civ.2780
A-59| Imperial Products CoZ, Inc. Vv. Grinne
Corp., et al _~ A 2 qe " 68Civ.2781
A-60] Central Office Alarm Co., I v. B | | Grinnell Corp., et al._Zg&Xe4 2 _d 68Civ.2782
A-61}] Damon Alarm Corp., et al. v. AmericapyBl } :[ District Telegraph Co., et al. A A py = 68Civ.2789A-62{ Walworth Co., et al. v. Grianell | i \ : \ |Corp., et al. Som | " J68Civ. 2828
A-63] Silberman Fur Corp., et al. v. Holmes
Electric Protection Co. TT, LL 68Civ.2829
7D a — rf perl 7 5 :
IP ZEEE JHE pr 7CTFRTIIZ CPU 70 |DOCKET -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION —_— C DESCRIPTION OF LITIGATION DOCKET NO.9 - PROTECTION DEVICES AND EQUIPMENT AND CENTRAL STATION PROTECTION : SERVICE ANTITRUST CASES DateéM District : No. Caption ) Shinlepnle Court Judge D.C. No. “7 7 4 1 79 A-64] Brink's, Inc., ov AAT ttl : ly C Corp., et al. Ill., N. 66Civ.2125 A-65) Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Grinnell Corp : | : et al. wt i » 867Civ.776 A--64 Western Auto. Supply Co. v. Grinnell. | : Corp., et al. ] vr. ro 67Civ.918 PY. AL ay ; . A-67 J Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Grinnel / aa) \ y/ y/ 77Corp., et al. I ! ” 3 Ng§67Civ.1167 A-68| Stackler Enterprises v. American ) |) | District Tg °5r3eh Co., et al. y 2/7" i esciv.33lA-69] Pizitz, Inc. ale. v. AAmgri : | bistro HEIST br Pet fre fh LY} 21a., v. 5 67Civ.471 A-70] Manhattan-Ward, Inc., et al. v. lO. Grinnell orp. pei ak, or pa, 5.75] fos-1489 A-71}] City of Detroit, et al. v. Grinnell Corp. Sly one meen ARE] "7 68-1478 A-72] 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc., et al : | v. Grin ‘ t_ a EP " // 68-1479: ASK A-73| Associated Barr Stores, Inc., et al. | : py, v. Grinnell Corp., et al. = ' =’ oo. (a 68-1490 A-74] Rhodes Western v. Grinnell Corp., |] 4 ] et al. o SE | calif., N.2 49577 a-75 | Security ProLfRtianhl atime Roma | |et al. ¥. ericah District Te egr 37 No ibe C 1Co. A N.Y., W. Yv l68-210 V&A ; 4
DOCKET -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION :
ee =
C DESCRIPTION OF LITIGATION
DOCKET NO. 9 - PROTECTION DEVICE AND EQUIPMENT AND CENTRAL STATION PROTECTION SERVICE
ANTITRUST CASES
D ®! District :
No. Caption : plnleech Court Judge D.C. No.
bcd J
B~1 jState of New Jergeé fo Gig, ocho aba > 4 MA ¥linois, N. Perry ~\ §68C 1667
® B-2 lState of Maryland A Coetntbl Cadoat at 165 J, 2 [Y1inois, N. # Perry N 68C 1663
B-3 State of comet cr. Gimme cheb] py cd: linois, N gf Perry Nlosc 1662B-4 |Electro-Protective Corporation, National
Protective Corporation, and Freddie Schnell § N :
v. Grinnell Corporation and American CL |
District CPHEED vne New Jersey jCiv. 763-68 /C Yl
; Ce Tria) EE LE
d | I L -
ere Fes SO TDS a SE
F. ‘ ‘ Ie ) ~~ - wT y J 1A? 4 2) g Idy; i. '
C »“J pp > 7 }
X-1 {Morse Si “yices, Ing. al, d T7/ : }
| | Grin oFpofatiorn, © . Worse N.Y., S. 68 Civ.3538
| X-2 |Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.,.et {INT/{ |
| al. v. Grinnell Corp., et al. ~~ “f2/25/9f] N.Y., S. : $68 Civ3229
X-3 Mutual Central Stations Alarm Corp. Vv. I i }
The Protectowire Co. £ZLd ac PP 1%] 1% 5 169 civ 110X-4 JM. N. Landau Stores, Ing. v. Grinnell NTN
Corporation, etc. A = << 7b N.X,,, 5S. 69 Civ 141
12/5 ¢ : ‘
X-5 | M. H. Fishman Co., Inc. ,v. Grniiell NTN | 7
Corporation, etc. Re 2rIcde ccf /34 2 r S. 29 Civ 135ATTORNEY LIST -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION @® DESCRIPTION OF LITIGATIONoo Docket No. 9 - MULTIDISTRICT CIVIL ANTITRUST ACTIONS INVOLVING PROTECTION DEVICES AND EQUIPMENT AND CENTRAL STATION PROTECTION SERVICES No. PIERRE. Interested | Counsel Defendant . Hopkins, Sutter, Owen, Mulroywentz & Davis Winston B. McCall One North LaSalle Street oderick M., MacLeod, Jr. Esq. Chicaco. T11 Pritchard, McCall & Jones 89> 831 Frank Nelson Bldg. .CL Seymour Simon Birmingham, Ala 35203 9 South LaSalle St James C. Barton Esq. hicago, Ill pani for Savings Bldg. tackler, Levenfeld, Levy and Stacklerirmlnghat, fia. 1 South LaSalle St nicago, Ill. Drayton T. Scott, Esq. Noel E. Story Esq. Antitrust Div. First National Bldg. Dept. of Justice Birmingham. Ala. Washington, D.C. George H. Brown, Esq. . Robinson, Williams, Brown Sasev, Lane & Mittendorf Robinson & Angeloff New York a Y. 10004 700 Reynolds Arcade Bldg. > Rochester, New York Richard M. Clinton Esq. Steinhart, Goldberg, Feigenbaum & Lado pept. of JusticeSuite 900 & ve | 111 Sutter Street E . | San Francisco, Calif. Wolff, Block, Schorr, Solas-Cohen | C ackard Bldg. : | David Berger hiladelphia, Pa. 100 nol oe. tonsagud 72 ier & Coh sek, Ind & \itgen§o\ 26 \BroYdw NewYork, \. 10 James F. Fahenden, Jr. N : 38 South Dearborn Street gellyfotebarl ¢ Manges Chicago, Ill. New Yorm N.Y. 10017 : Richard E. Powell . . @ [eo hams sere Marvin Fenster, Esquire | , Chicago, Ill New York N.Y. 10001 Arnstein, Gluck, Weizenfeld & Minow Liebman. Eulau. Robinson & Perlman 120 South LaSalle St 32 East 57th St Chicago, Ill. New York, N.Y. 10022
No. RTOX
| Parxer, Chapin & Flattau Sidney Goldstein C
530 Fifth Ave. 11 Eighth Ave. 4
| New York City, New York New York, N.Y. 11
Gould & Wilkie Kramer, Lowenstein, Nessen & Kamin
1 Wall St. 500 Fifth Ave. N.Y. 10036
New York, N.Y. 10005
Ben Herzberg
Solinger & GpbRdon Hays, Sklar, & Herzberg
250 Park Ave. 200 Park Ave.
New York City, N.Y. New York, N.Y. 10017
Rosenman, Colin, Kaye, Petschek Polier, Tulin & Payson C Freund & Emil 22 East 40th St.
575 Madison Ave. New York City, N.Y. 10016
New York City, N.Y.
Dickstein, Shapiro Silver & Galligan
Halperin, Shivitz, Scholer & Steingut f20 East 46th St.
11 East 44th St. New York, N.Y. 10017
| New York City, N.Y.
| Winer, Neuburger & Sive
| Rubin, Wachtel, Baum & Levin Whs Park Ave.
598 Madison Ave. New York City, N.Y. 10022
New York N.Y. 10022
Joel E. Huffman
| Hannigan, Miller, Schwartz & Cohn Wald, Hurkrader & Rockefeller 2290 First National Bldg. 1225 19th St. N.W.
| Detroit, Michigan 148226 Washington D.C.
| Nierenberg, Gilixon, Zeif & Weinstein Jack Lipson I 230 Park Ave. Arnold & Porter
New York City, N.Y. 10017 1239 19th St. N.W.
Washington D.C. 20046
Simpson, Thacher, & Bartlett
1120 Broadway J. Lee Rankin
New York City, N.Y. 10005 Coproration Counsel
City of New York C Stroock & Stroock & Lavan Law Dept.
{61 Broadway unicipal Bldg.
New York N.Y. 10006 New York, New York 10007
Holtzmann, Wise & Shepard Peter Haagland
130 Broad Street ald, Harkrader & Rockefeller
New York, N.Y. 10004 1225 19th St. N.W.
ashington, D.C.
{Louis Lefkowitz
Capitol Matthew Kenney
Albany, New York 12224 Howry, Simon, Baker & McHerson
or 707 H. St.N.W. C180 Centre Street ashington D.C. 4
iNew York, N.Y. 10013 :ATTORNEY LIST -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION ® ~~ DESCRIPTION OF LITIGATION DOCKET NO. 9 - PROTECTION DEVICE AND EQUIPMENT AND CENTRAL STATION PROTECTION SERVICE ANTITRUST CASES No. Plaintiff Defendant B-1 (a) Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, State (a) Denis G. McInerney & Thomas Curnin ® of New Jersey, State House Annex, Cahill, Gordon, Sonnett, Reindel & Ohl Trenton, New Jersey 08625 80 Pine St., New York, N.Y. 10005 (b) Joseph A. Hoffman, First Assistant | (b) Macdonald Flinn, White & Case, 14 Wall St., Attorney General, State of New Jersey, New York, N.Y. 10005 State House Annex, Trenton, New : Jersey 08625 (¢) J. Francis layden, Stickles, Hayden, Kenned Hort & Van Steenburgh, 36 West 44th St., (¢) Granvil I. Specks & Sheldon O. Collen, : New York, N.Y. 10036 208 South La Salle St., Chicago, Illinois 60604 (d) Bud G. Holman, Kelley, Drye, Newhall, ° Maginnes & Warren, 350 Park Avenue, (d) Perry Goldberg, 208 South La Salle St., New York, N.Y. 10022 Chicago, Illinois 60604 | (e) Benjamin M. Quigg, Jr., Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, 123 South Broad Street, Philadelphia, Pa. 19109 B-2 (a) Francis B. Burch, Attorney General, Same as B-1 (a), (b), (¢), (d) and (e) State of Maryland, One Charles Center, Baltimore, Maryland 21201 (b) William L. Siskind & Neil Tabor, 940 Maryland National Bank Building, ® 10 Light St., Baltimore, Md. 21202 Same as B-1 (c) and (d) B-3 | (a) Robert K. Killian, Attorney General, Same as B-1 (a), (b), (¢), (d) and (e) State of Connecticut, State Office Building, 30 Trinity St., Hartford, Connecticut (b) Norris L. O'Neill, 50 State Street Hartford, Connecticut 06103 C Same as B-1 (c¢) and (d)
No. : Plaintiff Defendant B-4 (a) Sidney Krieger, Krieger & Zucker, Same as B-1 (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) @® 11 Commerce Street, Newark, N.J. O0710f (b) Wm. Warfield Ross, Donald IH. Green & Joel E. Hoffman, Wald, Harkrader & Rockefeller, 1225 - 19th St., N.W., Washington, U. C. 20036 X-1 § a. David I. Shapiro, Esquire @®| Dickstein, Shapiro, Dennis & Galligan 20 East 46th Street New York, New York 10017
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.