STETSON v. CAHILL STRONG TECH, INC.

1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
EVANSVILLE DIVISION
JAY STETSON, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
)
v. 	) 	No. 3:25-cv-00093-RLY-CSW
)
CAHILL STRONG TECH, INC. Clerk's
Entry of Default entered on 7/29/2025,
)
)
)
Defendant. 	)
O RDER SCHEDULING SHOW C AUSE H EARING
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff/Judgment-Creditor Jay Stetson’s
Motion for Order to Show Cause, which was urged during the February 23, 2026,
hearing on Plaintiff/Judgment-Creditor’s Motion for Proceedings Supplemental.
Said Motion is GRANTED.
Defendant/Judgment-Debtor must appear and show cause why it should not
be held in contempt for its failure to comply with this Court’s January 5, 2026 Order
(Dkt. 19) requiring Defendant/Judgment-Debtor to appear for the hearing on
Plaintiff/Judgment-Creditor’s Motion for Proceedings Supplemental scheduled for
February 23, 2026, at 11:00 a.m. (Central Time), and to answer Plaintiff/Judgment-
Creditor’s First Set of Interrogatories on or before February 13, 2026.
Additionally, the corporate representative of Cahill Strong Tech, Inc., d/b/a
Crystal Onyx, is ORDERED to appear personally before United States Magistrate
Judge Crystal S. Wildeman, in Room 301, Winfield K. Denton Federal
Building and U.S. Courthouse, 101 NW Martin Luther King Jr Blvd,
Evansville, Indiana 47708 on April 21, 2026, at 12:00 p.m. (Central Time), to
answer under oath and on the record as to any assets, income, and other non-
exempt property of Cahill Strong Tech, Inc., d/b/a Crystal Onyx, which are available
to satisfy the judgment.
Case 3:25-cv-00093-RLY-CSW Document 29 Filed 03/10/26 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:
<pageID>

2
Cahill Strong Tech, Inc., d/b/a Crystal Onyx, is further ORDERED to SHOW
CAUSE in writing no later than April 10, 2026, as to why it should not be held
in contempt for failing to appear at the hearing on Plaintiff/Judgment-Creditor’s
Motion for Proceedings Supplemental and for failing to respond to
Plaintiff/Judgment-Creditor’s First Set of Interrogatories attached to the Court’s
prior Order.
Cahill Strong Tech, Inc., d/b/a Crystal Onyx is further ORDERED to respond
to Plaintiff/Judgment-Creditor’s First Set of Interrogatories attached to this Order
on or before April 10, 2026.
Plaintiff is ordered to notify the Court via a filed Notice no later than April
15, 2026, whether Cahill Strong Tech, Inc., d/b/a Crystal Onyx has complied with
the directives in this Order.
The Court specifically advises that failure to appear may result in the Court
issuing a Writ of Body Attachment, and the U.S. Marshal or its designee to be
ordered to take Mr. Cahill into custody pending a show cause hearing.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this order
on Cahill Strong Tech, Inc. d/b/a Crystal Onyx, via certified mail, as well as the
individual Anthony Phillip Cahill III at the addresses noted in the distribution list,
and file a certificate of service in this case.
SO ORDERED.
Date: March 10, 2026
Case 3:25-cv-00093-RLY-CSW Document 29 Filed 03/10/26 Page 2 of 6 PageID #:
<pageID>

3
Distribution:
Distributed electronically to ECF registered counsel of record.
(Service to be performed by Plaintiff)
Cahill Strong Tech, Inc. d/b/a Crystal Onyx c/o LegalCorp Solutions, LLC
8520 Allison Pointe Blvd.
Suite 220
Indianapolis, IN, 46250
Cahill Strong Tech, Inc. d/b/a Crystal Onyx
800 Sycamore St., #329
Evansville, IN 47708
Cahill Strong Tech, Inc. d/b/a Crystal Onyx
c/o Anthony Phillip Cahill III
6712 Pennan Ct.
Noblesville, IN 46062
Case 3:25-cv-00093-RLY-CSW Document 29 Filed 03/10/26 Page 3 of 6 PageID #:
<pageID>

4
NOTICE OF CERTAIN EXEMPTIONS AND YOUR RIGHT TO A PROMPT HEARING
It may be that the Plaintiff has or will give notice to your bank or other person
holding property or assets for you of the intent to put a hold on certain accounts
held by you, either individually or jointly with another person, including, but not
limited to bank, share, and credit union accounts. Under Indiana law, this notice
may already have resulted in the placing of a hold on those accounts. UNDER
FEDERAL 	AND 	STATE 	LAW, 	CERTAIN 	FUNDS 	ARE 	EXEMPT 	FROM
GARNISHMENT. THIS MEANS THAT THESE FUNDS MAY NOT BE TAKEN
BY CREDITORS EVEN IF THEY HAVE BEEN DEPOSITED INTO YOUR
ACCOUNT. 	SOCIAL 	SECURITY, 	SUPPLEMENTAL 	SECURITY 	INCOME,
VETERANS BENEFITS, CERTAIN DISABILITY PENSION BENEFITS, AND
BENEFITS 	UNDER 	ANY 	PENSION 	PAID 	FROM 	A TRUST QUALIFIED
UNDER THE EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT INCOME SECURITY ACT OF 1974
CANNOT BE TAKEN. THERE MAY BE OTHER EXEMPTIONS UNDER STATE
OR FEDERAL LAW. IF YOU OR ANOTHER PERSON WHO MAINTAINS A
JOINT ACCOUNT WITH YOU BELIEVE THAT ALL OR SOME OF THE FUNDS
IN THESE ACCOUNTS ARE EXEMPT, YOU OR YOUR JOINT DEPOSITOR
ARE ENTITLED TO A PROMPT HEARING IN THIS COURT TO PRESENT
EVIDENCE 	TO 	ESTABLISH EXEMPTIONS AND TO SEEK REMOVAL OF
THE HOLD. To obtain such a hearing, fill in the form marked “Exemption Claim
and Request for Hearing” attached hereto and return to this Court either by mail
or by personally bringing it to the Court. A copy of that form should also be sent
to plaintiff’s attorney or to the plaintiff, if the plaintiff is not represented by an
attorney, at the address set forth on the next page. A prompt hearing will be
scheduled by the Court as soon as possible but generally no later than 5 days
(excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays) after the completed form is
received by the Court. 	The cause number is located on the first page of this
document at the top of the right-hand side. After the hearing, the Court will decide
whether all or part of the funds in each account on which a hold has been placed
or other accounts in which you have an interest may be taken by Plaintiff. If a joint
depositor or you do not request an early hearing, there will be a hearing at the time
when you are ordered to appear. At that hearing, you and a joint depositor are
entitled to assert any exemptions. However, if a joint depositor or you do not
request an early hearing, each account on which a hold has been placed may not
be released until the time you are ordered to appear.
Date: March 10, 2026
Case 3:25-cv-00093-RLY-CSW Document 29 Filed 03/10/26 Page 4 of 6 PageID #:
<pageID>

5
EXEMPTION CLAIM AND REQUEST FOR HEARING
(Send this part to the Court)
TO: 	HON. CRYSTAL S. WILDEMAN, JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA, EVANSVILLE
DIVISION
Re: 	Cause No. 3:25-CV-00093-RLY-CSW
I believe that all or part of the money in my account(s) that may have been
frozen cannot be frozen since the account(s) contain exempt funds. I would like a
hearing at the earliest time.
(Signature)
(Address)
(Printed Name)
(Phone During Business Hours)
Check One: 	I am the judgment defendant.
I maintain an account with the judgment
defendant.
Case 3:25-cv-00093-RLY-CSW Document 29 Filed 03/10/26 Page 5 of 6 PageID #:
<pageID>

6
EXEMPTION CLAIM AND REQUEST FOR HEARING
(Send this part to Plaintiff’s attorney)
To: 	Anthony S. Ridolfo
Christopher J.
Hammerle Jacob P.
Eckhardt
HACKMAN
HULETT LLP
135 N. Pennsylvania St., Suite 1610
Indianapolis, IN 46204
Re: 	Cause No. 3:25-CV-00093-RLY-CSW
I believe that all or part of the money in my account(s) that may have been
frozen cannot be frozen since the account(s) contain exempt funds. I would like a
hearing at the earliest time.
(Signature)
(Address)
(Printed Name)
(Phone During Business Hours)
Check One: 	I am the judgment defendant.
I maintain an account with the judgment
defendant.
Case 3:25-cv-00093-RLY-CSW Document 29 Filed 03/10/26 Page 6 of 6 PageID #:
<pageID>