3:24-cv-00097•GOODWIN v. GRAY et al
Full text
FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA Kristine L. Seufert, Clerk 11/13/2025 Case 3:24-cv-00097-RLY-CSW Document 78 Filed 11/13/25 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 433 The Court interprets Plaintiff's Motion as a report of having received responses from Aramark with no further remedy sought. Therefore, the Motion is DENIED. Crystal S. Wildeman U.S. Magistrate Judge Date: November 19, 2025 Distributed via U.S. Mail to: DAVID GOODWIN 250040 BRANCHVILLE - CF BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY Inmate Mail/Parcels 21390 Old State Road 37 BRANCHVILLE, IN 47514 Case 3:24-cv-00097-RLY-CSW Document 81 Filed 11/19/25 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
Case 3:24-cv-00097-RLY-CSW Document 78 Filed 11/13/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 434 Case 3:24-cv-00097-RLY-CSW Document 81 Filed 11/19/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.