3:25-cv-01138•Baczewski v. Schnuck Markets Inc.
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JUDY BACZEWSKI, Plaintiff, v. SCHNUCK MARKETS INC. and BRADLEY MINEMAN, Defendant. Case No. 25-cv-1138-JPG MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff Judy Baczewski’s motion to remand this case in light of the addition of a new defendant, Bradley Mineman, who destroys diversity jurisdiction (Doc. 21). The defendants have informed the Court via email that they do not intend to respond to Baczewski’s motion. Indeed, it appears remand is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(e), which requires remand of a case removed on the basis of diversity jurisdiction if a non-diverse defendant is joined. This case was originally removed under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a) from the Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St. Clair County, Illinois, on the basis of diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a); Baczewski and Schnuck’s Markets Inc. were completely diverse and more than $75,000 was in issue. Baczewski sought to amend her complaint to add Mineman, who shares citizenship with her. Receiving no objection from Schnuck’s, the Court allowed the amendment. Mineman’s presence in this litigation destroyed diversity jurisdiction, so the Court must remand the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(e). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Baczewski’s motion to remand (Doc. 21) and REMANDS this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction to the Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St. Clair County, Illinois. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: December 22, 2025 s/ J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT DISTRICT JUDGE Case 3:25-cv-01138-JPG Document 23 Filed 12/23/25 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #<pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.