Crosby v. Robinson

1:25-cv-00654IddJan 22, 2026

Full text

Case 1:25-cv-00654-AKB Document 5 Filed 01/22/26 Page 1 of 1

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 1:25-cv-00654-AKB Document5 - Filed 01/22/26 Pagelof1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
NICOLE RENEE CROSBY,
Case No. 1:25-cv-00654-AKB
Plaintiff,
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER
vs. BY SCREENING JUDGE

CASEY U. ROBINSON,

Defendant.

Plaintiff Nicole Crosby (“Plaintiff”) brings an action against Judge Casey U. Robinson, a
magistrate judge in Gooding County. Dkt. 2. She had already done so in two other cases: Case
No. 1:24-cv-00472-BLW, Crosby v. Gooding County Courts, et al. (“Case No. 24-cv-472”), and
Case No. 1:25-cv-00618-AKB, Crosby v. Robinson.

Judge Winmill informed Plaintiff of the standard of law to overcome absolute judicial
immunity and dismissed the claims against Judge Robinson with prejudice in Case No. 1:24-cv-
00472-BLW, Dkt. 12. That case remains open. If Plaintiff has additional facts or claims against
Judge Robinson showing that her claims here are not subject to judicial immunity, she must bring
them in an amended complaint in Case No. 1:24-cv-00472-BLW. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED

that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice to Plaintiff bringing her claims in Case No. 1:24-

cv-00472-BLW and the In Forma Pauperis Application (Dkt. 1) is DENIED as MOOT.

wi}

DATED: January 22, 2026

Amanda K. Brailsford
USS. District Court Judge

-

LRicy

INITIAL REVIEW ORDER BY SCREENING JUDGE - 1

AUTHENTICATED
U.S. GOVERNMENT
INFORMATION

GPO

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.