USA v. Pridgette

1:25-cr-00080IddFeb 2, 2026

Full text

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
LAJAI JAMAR PRIDGETTE,
Defendant.
Case No. 1:25-cr-00080-DCN
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation filed by the United States
Magistrate Judge. Dkt. 32. On January 13, 2026, Defendant, LaJai Jamar Pridgette,
appeared before the Magistrate Judge to enter a change of plea pursuant to a written plea
agreement. The Magistrate Judge conducted the plea hearing and concluded there is a
factual basis for Defendant’s plea of guilty to the charges contained in Count One of the
Superseding Information (Dkt. 24), and that it was entered voluntarily and with full
knowledge of the consequences. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have
been filed.
The Court now has reviewed the record, and find that the requirements of Rule 11
have been met. 	See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114 (9 th Cir. 2003).
Specifically, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge adhered to the requirements of Rule
11(b); that under Rule 11(b)(2), the Defendant’s plea was voluntary and not the result of
Case 1:25-cr-00080-DCN Document 34 Filed 02/02/26 Page 1 of 2
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 2
force or threats or promises apart from the plea agreement; and that a factual basis for the
plea exists. See id. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 32) shall
be, and the same is hereby, ADOPTED as the decision of the District Court and
incorporated fully herein by reference.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant’s plea of guilty to the crimes
charged in Count One of the Superseding Information (Dkt. 24), shall be, and the same is
hereby, ACCEPTED by the Court as a knowing and voluntary plea supported by an
independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of the offense.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant, Lajai Jamar Pridgette, is found to
be GUILTY as to the applicable crimes charged in the Superseding Information. Dkt. 24.
DATED: February 2, 2026
_________________________
David C. Nye
U.S. District Court Judge
Case 1:25-cr-00080-DCN Document 34 Filed 02/02/26 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.