Case Name in Immigration Case - Unavailable

7:26-cv-00218GamdOct 14, 2026

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
VALDOSTA DIVISION
N.S.P., 	:
:
Petitioner, 	:
:
v. 	: 	CASE NO.: 7:26-CV-218 (LAG)
:
DAVID PAULK, et al., 	:
:
Respondents. 	:
:
ORDER
On August 12, 2026, the Court issued an Order on Petitioner’s Motion for Order to
Show Cause (Doc. 3) and Petition (Doc. 1). (Doc. 4). Therein, the Court ordered that
Petitioner be granted a bond hearing but failed to include specific language regarding
requirements of said hearing. (Id.). On August 28, 2026, Petitioner filed an Emergency
Motion to Enforce Judgment (Doc. 5), requesting that the Court “enforce or clarify or
modify its August 12, 2026 Order granting his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and
directing Respondents to provide an individualized bond hearing” and, “alternatively, “to
grant further habeas relief.” (Id. at 1). This Order amends the August 12, 2026 Order
(Doc. 4) to address the deficiency in the Court’s Order.
The Court may apply Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 cases in this action.
§ 2254 Rule 1(b) (“The district court may apply any or all of these rules to a habeas corpus
petition not covered by Rule 1(a) [which addresses petitions under 28 U.S.C. § 2254].”).
Under Rule 4, if a petition is not dismissed on preliminary review, then “the judge must
order the respondent to file an answer, motion, or other response within a fixed time, or to
take other action the judge may order.” § 2254 Rule 4. Applying Rule 4, the Court issues
the following order.
This case appears to involve the same issues raised in J.A.M. v. Streeval, No. 4:25-
CV-342-CDL, 2025 WL 3050094 (M.D. Ga. Nov. 1, 2025) and P.R.S. v. Streeval, No.
Case 7:26-cv-00218-LAG-CHW Document 8 Filed 10/14/26 Page 1 of 2
2
4:25-cv-330-CDL, 2025 WL 3269947 (M.D. Ga. Nov. 24, 2025). In those cases, the Court
concluded that for noncitizens “who are found in the country unlawfully and are arrested”
without having been inspected by an examining immigration officer, then “an immigration
officer or immigration judge has the discretion” under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) to grant them
release on bond unless a statutory exception applies under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c). J.A.M., 2025
WL 3050094, at *3; P.R.S., 2025 WL 3269947, at *1–*2. Mandatory detention under
8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2) “is not authorized” in such cases. P.R.S., 2025 WL 3269947, at *2;
see Hernandez Alvarez v. Warden, Fed. Det. Ctr., 175 F.4th 1258, 1281 (11th Cir. 2026)
(finding 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2) only applies to those aliens “who have not yet entered the
United States, but are ‘seeking admission’ at the border”).
Based upon the rationale of J.A.M. and P.R.S., Respondents in this action are hereby
ORDERED to provide Petitioner with a bond hearing within SEVENTY-TWO (72)
HOURS to determine if Petitioner may be released on bond under § 1226(a)(2) and the
applicable regulations. The bond hearing shall comport with all requirements of due
process, including the requirement that the Department of Homeland Security shall bear
the burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that Petitioner is either a
danger to the community or a flight risk.1 See J.G. v. Warden, Irwin Cnty. Det. Ctr., 501
F. Supp. 3d 1331, 1335 (M.D. Ga. 2020).
Once such a bond hearing is provided, Petitioner will have received the remedy that
the Court is authorized to order, and Petitioner should file a notice of dismissal.
SO ORDERED, this 14th day of October, 2026.
/s/ Leslie A. Gardner
LESLIE A. GARDNER, CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1 The Court notes that Petitioner previously received a bond hearing before an Immigration Judge. (See
Doc. 5.). However, the burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that Petitioner was neither
a danger to the community nor a flight risk was placed on Petitioner. See, e.g. D.Y.E.H. v. Warden, Irwin
Detention Center, 839 F.Supp.3d 1170, 1184 (M.D. Ga. 2026) (ordering a second bond hearing where the
burden of proof was misplaced on Petitioner during a prior bond hearing).
Case 7:26-cv-00218-LAG-CHW Document 8 Filed 10/14/26 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.