Marie Cassano v. Princess Cruise Lines Ltd. et al

CV-90 (12/02) 	CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL 	Initials of Deputy Clerk DTA
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.: 	2:25-cv-11759-SVW-MAR 	Date: 	January 14, 2026
Title: 	Marie Cassano v. Princess Cruise Lines Ltd. et al
Present: The Honorable 	STEPHEN V. WILSON, United States District Judge
Daniel Tamayo 	N/A
Deputy Clerk 	Court Reporter
Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): 	Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s):
None Appearing 	None Appearing
Proceedings: 	[In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of
Prosecution
Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be
dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962)
(Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).
The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its
own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before January
23, 2026, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This
matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. See Fed. R.
Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.
☒ 	Defendant(s) Princess Cruise Lines Ltd. did not answer the
complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking entry of
default or by dismissing the complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Case 1:26-cv-20488-AHS Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/14/2026 Page 1 of 1