Demore v. Klone Enterprises et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 0:16-CV-61647-GAYLES/HUNT
AARON DEMORE,
Plaintiff,
v.
KLONE ENTERPRISES,
JOHN GANCI, and
DANA GANCI,
Defendants.
ORDER
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate
Judge Patrick M. Hunt (the “Report”). [ECF No. 96]. On April 14, 2025, Plaintiff, now pro se,
filed a letter requesting “a Writ of Garnishment to be immediately executed against Mr. Colon’s
employer,” which the Court construes as a Motion for Writ of Garnishment. [ECF No. 88 at 1].
The Court referred the case to Judge Hunt for all post-judgment proceedings. [ECF No. 89]. On
November 17, 2025, Judge Hunt issued his Report, recommending that the Court deny the Motion
without prejudice. [ECF No. 96]. No party timely filed objections.
A 	district 	court 	may 	accept, 	reject, 	or 	modify 	a 	magistrate 	judge’s 	report 	and
recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The objected portions of the report and recommendation
are accorded de novo review if those objections “pinpoint the specific findings that the party
disagrees with.” United States v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353, 1360 (11th Cir. 2009); see also Fed. R. Civ.
P. 72(b)(3). Any portions of the report and recommendation to which no specific objection is made
are reviewed only for clear error. Liberty Am. Ins. Grp., Inc. v. WestPoint Underwriters, L.L.C.,
______________________________/
Case 0:16-cv-61647-DPG Document 97 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/12/2025 Page 1 of 2

2
199 F. Supp. 2d 1271, 1276 (M.D. Fla. 2001); accord Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781,
784 (11th Cir. 2006). Given that the parties have not objected to any portion of the Report, the
Court reviewed the Report for clear error. Finding no clear error, the Court agrees with Judge
Hunt’s findings and conclusion that the Motion should be denied without prejudice.
CONCLUSION
Therefore, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
(1) 	The Report and Recommendation, [ECF No. 96], is ADOPTED in full;
(2) 	Plaintiff’s Motion for Writ of Garnishment [ECF No. 88], is DENIED without
prejudice. Plaintiff may file a renewed motion within thirty days of the Court’s Order.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 12th day of December, 2025.
________________________________
DARRIN P. GAYLES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 0:16-cv-61647-DPG Document 97 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/12/2025 Page 2 of 2