5:25-cv-00224•HOGAN v. ROBERTSON et al
Full text
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION MICHAEL HOGAN, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 5:25-cv-224-MCR-MJF D. ROBERTSON, et al., Defendants. / ORDER The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation dated October 9, 2025, ECF No. 8. Plaintiff was furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and was afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). There have been no timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation and the record, the Court concludes that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 8, is adopted and incorporated by reference into this Order. 2. This civil action is DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 1915A(b), for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Case 5:25-cv-00224-MCR-MJF Document 12 Filed 02/10/26 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2 3. The clerk of court will enter judgment accordingly and close this case file. DONE and ORDERED this 10 th day of February 2026. M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 5:25-cv-00224-MCR-MJF Document 12 Filed 02/10/26 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.