HOGAN v. ROBERTSON et al

5:25-cv-00224FlndFeb 10, 2026

Full text

Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
MICHAEL HOGAN,
Plaintiff,
v. 	Case No. 5:25-cv-224-MCR-MJF
D. ROBERTSON, et al.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation dated October 9,
2025, ECF No. 8. Plaintiff was furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation
and was afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States
Code, Section 636(b)(1). There have been no timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation and the record, the Court
concludes that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
1. 	The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 8, is
adopted and incorporated by reference into this Order.
2. 	This civil action is DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)
and 1915A(b), for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted.
Case 5:25-cv-00224-MCR-MJF Document 12 Filed 02/10/26 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2
3. 	The clerk of court will enter judgment accordingly and close this case
file.
DONE and ORDERED this 10 th day of February 2026.
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 5:25-cv-00224-MCR-MJF Document 12 Filed 02/10/26 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.