JACKSON v. WALTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION

3:25-cv-02549FlndJan 5, 2026

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
DOUGLAS MARSHALL JACKSON,
Plaintiff,
v. 	Case No.: 3:25cv2549-MW/HTC
WALTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,
Defendants.
_________________________/
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation, ECF No. 3, and has also reviewed de novo Plaintiff’s objections,
ECF No. 6. Plaintiff’s objections are largely nonsensical and do not persuade this
Court that the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation for dismissal is incorrect.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
The report and recommendation, ECF No. 3, is accepted and adopted, over
the Plaintiff’s objections, as this Court’s opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment
stating, “This case is DISMISSED without prejudice because Plaintiff is a three-
striker under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) who failed to pay the filing fee at the time of suit.”
Case 3:25-cv-02549-MW-HTC Document 8 Filed 01/05/26 Page 1 of 2
2
Plaintiff’s “motion for order,” ECF No. 5, is DENIED as moot. The Clerk shall
close the file.
SO ORDERED on January 5, 2026.
s/Mark E. Walker 	____
United States District Judge
Case 3:25-cv-02549-MW-HTC Document 8 Filed 01/05/26 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.