VICE v. ARAMARK CORPORATION et al

Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
THOMAS JOHN VICE,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 3:25cv2303-LC-HTC
ARAMARK CORP., et al.,
Defendants.
_________________________/
ORDER
The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on August 25,
2025 (ECF No. 6), recommending that this case be dismissed without prejudice.
The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded
an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined the
Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 6) is
adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under this Court’s
inherent power for Plaintiff’s failure to truthfully disclose his litigation history.
Case 3:25-cv-02303-LC-HTC Document 7 Filed 01/20/26 Page 1 of 2

Page 2 of 2
3. The clerk shall close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 20th day of January, 2026.
s/L.A. Collier
LACEY A. COLLIER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No. 3:25cv2303-LC-HTC
Case 3:25-cv-02303-LC-HTC Document 7 Filed 01/20/26 Page 2 of 2