3:25-cv-01323•LEVINE v. DIXON
Full text
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION ARAY DONELL LEVINE, Petitioner, v. Case No. 3:25-cv-1323-TKW-MJF RICKY DIXON, Respondent. / ORDER This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16) and Petitioner’s objections (Doc. 17). No response to the objections is needed. The Court reviewed the issues raised in the objections de novo under 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), and based on that review, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s determination Petitioner’s amended §2254 habeas petition should be dismissed because it is time-barred. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 11) is GRANTED. Case 3:25-cv-01323-TKW-MJF Document 18 Filed 03/02/26 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2 3. Petitioner’s amended §2254 habeas petition (Doc. 6) is DISMISSED with prejudice because it is time-barred. 4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. 5. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close the case file. DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of March, 2026. __________________________________ T. KENT WETHERELL, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 3:25-cv-01323-TKW-MJF Document 18 Filed 03/02/26 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.