3:23-cv-18414•INGRAM et al v. BERTRAM et al
Full text
Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION GLORIA JEAN INGRAM and TRINITY KENNICE INGRAM, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 3:23-cv-18414-TKW-ZCB NATHAN BERTRAM, et al., Defendants. _____________________________/ ORDER This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Reports and Recommendations (R&Rs) (Docs. 96, 97). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of the R&Rs and the entire case file, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s determination that the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) Defendants (Miller and Manna) are entitled to judgment as a matter of law because the undisputed evidence establishes that they were not present when any force was used on Plaintiffs. The Court also agrees with the magistrate judge’s determination that the Walton County Sheriff Office (WCSO) defendants (Key, Coone, and Bertram) are entitled to judgment as a matter of law because the undisputed evidence establishes that Key and Coone did not use any force on Plaintiffs; that Bertram did not use any force on Plaintiff Trinity Ingram; and any force used by Bertram on Case 3:23-cv-18414-TKW-ZCB Document 98 Filed 12/19/25 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3 Plaintiff Gloria Ingram (and it is not clear that there was any) was not the cause of the injuries she allegedly suffered. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. The magistrate judge’s R&Rs are adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 2. The DEA Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 73) is GRANTED, and all claims against those defendants (Kevin Miller and John Manna) are DISMISSED with prejudice. 3. The WCSO defendants’ motions for summary judgment (Docs. 77, 78, 85) are GRANTED, and all claims against those defendants (Nathan Bertram, Steve Key, and Brandon Coone) are DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. The Clerk shall enter judgment, stating: Plaintiffs shall take nothing on their claims and Defendants shall go hence without day. 5. The Court reserves jurisdiction to consider any motions for sanctions against Plaintiffs’ former counsel. See Doc. 80. Any such motions shall be filed within 14 days from the date of this Order. 6. If any motions for sanctions are filed, the Clerk shall refer them to the magistrate judge for disposition under Local Rule 72.3. If no motions are filed, the Clerk shall close the case file. Case 3:23-cv-18414-TKW-ZCB Document 98 Filed 12/19/25 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3 DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of December, 2025. __________________________________ T. KENT WETHERELL, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 3:23-cv-18414-TKW-ZCB Document 98 Filed 12/19/25 Page 3 of 3
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.