USA v. KERNEY

1:22-cr-00022FlndMar 16, 2026

Full text

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
GAINESVILLE DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v. Case Nos. 1:22-cr-22-AW-MAL
1:26-cv-11-AW-MAL
CARLOS KENTRAL KERNEY,
Defendant.
_______________________________/
ORDER DENYING § 2255 MOTION
Defendant Carlos Kentral Kerney filed a § 2255 motion raising two grounds.
ECF No. 121. In a thorough report and recommendation, the magistrate judge
recommends that the court deny the motion and deny a certificate of appealability.
ECF No. 123. Kerney filed objections, and I have considered the matter de novo. In
addition, Kerney filed a “motion for leave to supplement pleading.” ECF No. 127.
Having carefully considered the matter, I now adopt the report and
recommendation and incorporate it into this order. The clerk will enter a judgment
that says, “The § 2255 motion is denied on the merits.” A certificate of appealability
is denied.
The motion for leave to file a supplemental pleading (ECF No. 127) is
DENIED. Kerney has not shown why he could not have included the new allegations
earlier in the case, before the magistrate judge conducted her review and issued her
report and recommendation. Cf. Williams v. McNeil, 557 F.3d 1287, 1291-92 (11th
Case 1:22-cr-00022-AW-MAL Document 128 Filed 03/16/26 Page 1 of 2
2
Cir. 2009) (“Because the magistrate judge system was created to help alleviate the
workload of the district judges, it would be fundamentally unfair to permit a litigant
to set its case in motion before the magistrate, wait to see which way the wind was
blowing, and—having received an unfavorable recommendation—shift gears before
the district judge.” (cleaned up)); cf. also Carruthers v. BSA Advert., Inc., 357 F.3d
1213, 1218 (11th Cir. 2004) (“A motion to amend may be denied on numerous
grounds, such as undue delay . . . .” (cleaned up)). Moreover, Kerney has not shown
that any supplemental pleading would change anything.
SO ORDERED on March 16, 2026.
s/ Allen Winsor
Chief United States District Judge
Case 1:22-cr-00022-AW-MAL Document 128 Filed 03/16/26 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.