1:10-ap-10006•Akers v. Windward Capital Corporation et al
Full text
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA In re MARTHA A AKERS, Debtor. ____________________________ MARTHA A AKERS, Plaintiff, v. WINDWARD CAPITAL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 07-00662 (Chapter 13) Adversary Proceeding No. 10-10006 Not for Publication in West’s Bankruptcy Reporter MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING EMERGENCY MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION The plaintiff, Martha Akers, has filed an emergency motion for preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 55) seeking to have the court stay the enforcement by Windward Capital Corporation or its assigns from foreclosing on a deed of trust on property held by Akers. This emergency motion is identical to a previous motion for preliminary injunction Akers filed on June 2, 2010, save for that the emergency motion includes an affidavit signed by Akers The document below is hereby signed. Signed: July 25, 2010. _____________________________ S. Martin Teel, Jr. United States Bankruptcy Judge Case 10-10006 Doc 62 Filed 07/26/10 Entered 07/26/10 14:00:30 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 2
and several exhibits consisting of filings in this court, the deed of trust under which the defendant, presumably, would foreclose, several account statements, and several letters from the defendant and the plaintiff's insurance company. In a memorandum decision and order dated June 29, 2010, I denied the plaintiff's previous motion for preliminary injunction on the basis that Akers had failed to include an affidavit, as required District Court Local Civil Rule 65.1, and because the motion failed to demonstrate a likelihood of prevailing on the merits and irreparable harm. Although Akers' emergency motion now includes an affidavit, because the emergency motion is identical to the previous motion Akers has still failed to demonstrate a likelihood of prevailing on the merits and irreparable harm. Therefore, for the reasons set forth in the court's June 29, 2010, Memorandum Decision and Order Denying Amended Motion for Preliminary Injunction, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff's emergency motion for preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 55) is DENIED. [Signed and dated above.] Copies to: All parties and counsel of record. 2 O:\TEEL\Garrett\Orders\Misc\Deny Prelim Inj (Akers).wpd Case 10-10006 Doc 62 Filed 07/26/10 Entered 07/26/10 14:00:30 Desc Main Document Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.